2019
DOI: 10.2172/1574675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Thermolytic Hydrogen Generation Rate in Tank 28 and Tank 39 Samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

5
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Revision 0 vii [1][2][3][4] Methane was also detected in further thermolytic HGR testing, specifically with simulants containing trimethylsilanol (TMS). 1,5 This evidence of thermolytic methane generation prompted the authoring of the report, Evaluation of the Current State of Knowledge for Thermolysis of Organics within SRS Waste Forming Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).…”
Section: Srnl-sti-2020-00270mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Revision 0 vii [1][2][3][4] Methane was also detected in further thermolytic HGR testing, specifically with simulants containing trimethylsilanol (TMS). 1,5 This evidence of thermolytic methane generation prompted the authoring of the report, Evaluation of the Current State of Knowledge for Thermolysis of Organics within SRS Waste Forming Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).…”
Section: Srnl-sti-2020-00270mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In HGR radioactive waste testing, methane was detected in samples at elevated temperatures for Tanks 28, 38, and 44. [1][2][3][4] Volatile organic analysis (VOA) of the Tank 44 samples found 0.9 mg/L of octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane. 4 Octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane is possibly a degradation product or impurity of antifoam H-10, a polydimethylsiloxane-based antifoam that was formerly used in Concentration, Storage and Transfer Facility (CSTF) evaporators.…”
Section: Antifoam Degradation Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…23 Six tanks were identified for SRNL to perform HGR testing without and with added glycolate: 22, 28, 38, 39, 44, and 50. [24][25][26][27] To date, results from five of the six tests have been published in SRNL technical reports. No appreciable impact from added glycolate was observed in Tank 22 material.…”
Section: Comparison To Glycolate Hgr Measurements In Radioactive Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5] To date, SRNL personnel have performed several series of tests on both radioactive and simulated caustic waste to measure the thermolytic production of hydrogen gas from organics, including glycolate. [6][7][8][9] These hydrogen generation rate (HGR) measurements performed by SRNL have led to the generation of model expressions for the thermolytic production of hydrogen from glycolate and non-glycolate organics in caustic waste. 9 The HGR expression for glycolate thermolysis is derived from simulant testing and confirmed with radioactive waste testing with added glycolate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%