2021
DOI: 10.2991/aer.k.211106.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Utilization of Kaplan Turbines for PLTMH Power Plants

Abstract: The potential of water in Indonesia to generate electrical energy is quite large. This water potential is very suitable for generating small-scale energy. Water is sent through the penstock to drive the turbine. The turbine is coupled with a generator to produce electrical energy. The turbines used vary widely. For this research, the Kaplan turbine is used. The Kaplan turbine was chosen because of the low head required, which is suitable for conditions in Indonesia. The diameter of the Kaplan turbine tested wa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
(1 reference statement)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observation has been made that the curved fillet on the corner of the leading edge produces better outcomes than the sharp edge. It is also concluded that, like the Kaplan turbine (Maridjo et al 2021), Head @ FRR=0 (Rtu=0mm) Head @ FRR=0.046 (Rtu=2mm) Head @ FRR=0.093 (Rtu=4mm) Head @ FRR=0.13 (Rtu=6mm) Head @ FRR=0.18 (Rtu=8mm) Head @ FRR=0.23 (Rtu=10mm) Discharge @ FRR=0 (Rtu=0mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.046 (Rtu=2mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.093 (Rtu=4mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.13 (Rtu=6mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.18 (Rtu=8mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.23 (Rtu=10mm) Fig. 14.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Investigated Fillet Radiusmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The observation has been made that the curved fillet on the corner of the leading edge produces better outcomes than the sharp edge. It is also concluded that, like the Kaplan turbine (Maridjo et al 2021), Head @ FRR=0 (Rtu=0mm) Head @ FRR=0.046 (Rtu=2mm) Head @ FRR=0.093 (Rtu=4mm) Head @ FRR=0.13 (Rtu=6mm) Head @ FRR=0.18 (Rtu=8mm) Head @ FRR=0.23 (Rtu=10mm) Discharge @ FRR=0 (Rtu=0mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.046 (Rtu=2mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.093 (Rtu=4mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.13 (Rtu=6mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.18 (Rtu=8mm) Discharge @ FRR=0.23 (Rtu=10mm) Fig. 14.…”
Section: Performance Comparison Of Investigated Fillet Radiusmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These types of turbines are mostly investigated and adapted for the high-scale level with more than 3 meter of head (Martinez et al 2019). In reality, where very low head of water is available and requirement of electricity is small, this types of axial turbine may be helpful (Maridjo et al 2021). Rare study on runner blade for such a low head condition with horizontal arrangement of the turbine is found.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%