“…From the data, we get H K1,ʈ = 770 A / m ͑9.7 Oe͒ and H K2,Ќ = 1240 A / m ͑15.6 Oe͒ for the case ͑H x , h y ͒, and H K1,Ќ = 420 A / m ͑5.3 Oe͒ and H K2,ʈ = 1650 A / m ͑20.7 Oe͒ for the case ͑H y , h x ͒.For a perfect uniaxial anisotropy layer, the linear extrapolations should cross the H axis at the same values ͑H K,ʈ = H K,Ќ ͒, but here a strong difference between the two values is observed. This is commonly attributed to magnetization dispersion,26 which is verified here as the dispersion was indeed created in the sample. The estimated anisotropy fields, empirically derived from the average of H K,ʈ and H K,Ќ calculated either from the linear relations or from the extrapolations to the applied field axis, are H K1 = 595 A / m and H K2 = 1445 A / m. Nevertheless, it is impossible to describe the f r 2 dependence for the configurations ͑H x , h y ͒ and ͑H y , h x ͒ with the same set of values of H K 1 and H K 2 .…”