2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the relationship between facial injuries and traumatic brain injuries using a realistic subject-specific finite element head model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, although patients with upper frontal fractures are at the greatest risk of serious brain injuries, the kinetic energy absorption by the air-filled, compressible midfacial bones can serve as a decelerating cushion, protecting adjacent intracranial structures so reducing cerebral damage. This was refuted by Martin et al, 4 although 28 years later, Kwong et al 7 used a realistic finite element head model to support the kinetic absorption theory. They…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, although patients with upper frontal fractures are at the greatest risk of serious brain injuries, the kinetic energy absorption by the air-filled, compressible midfacial bones can serve as a decelerating cushion, protecting adjacent intracranial structures so reducing cerebral damage. This was refuted by Martin et al, 4 although 28 years later, Kwong et al 7 used a realistic finite element head model to support the kinetic absorption theory. They…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was no sufficient statistical significance to find, it is important to point out that the case numbers of subdural (32.43% of all second diagnosis) as well as epidural (21.28%) hematoma and subarachnoid hemorrhage (14.53%) decreased from being a second to being a fourth diagnosis whereas diagnoses such as skull and facial fracture or others were rather observed as a third or fourth diagnosis in serious injuries with more than two diagnoses apart from the main diagnosis “cerebral contusion.” For facial fractures, the intensity and location of the collision were of great significance for the severity and position of the facial bone fracture and therefore its impact as an or on a TBI. [ 24 ] Therefore, it seems to be necessary to do some more research on this topic in the future to examine the exact location of the facial fracture.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a reputation that the face protects the brain from head injury. 1 , 2 However, less certain evidence exists that facial fractures prevent brain injury acting as a shock absorber, although there are many reports that facial fractures are a marker for increased risk of brain injury. 3 – 5 We report 2 meaningful cases of the sphenozygomatic fracture with history of the Caldwell-Luc operation for chronic sinusitis.…”
Section: Sirmentioning
confidence: 99%