2017
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the quasi‐simultaneous arrival (QSA) effect on a CAMECA IMS 7f‐GEO

Abstract: QSA undercounting could compromise isotope ratio analyses requiring ~1 × 10 counts per second for the major isotope and primary currents <20 pA. The error could be >8‰ for a 1 pA primary current. However, correction can be accurately applied. For instrumental mass fractionation (IMF)-corrected data, the magnitude of the error resulting from not correcting for QSA is dependent on the difference in secondary ion count rate between the unknown and standard analyses. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is not possible to determine primary currents <50 pA very accurately on the 7f‐GEO instrument. Therefore, the ratio of the QSA coefficient (β) to the primary ion flux ( J ) was used to facilitate the correction . β/ J values were determined for each session, via data obtained from the internal standard grains, using the relationship: Rexp=Rcor+()normalβ/J×normalSexp34 where R exp and 34 S exp are the dead‐time corrected 34 S/ 32 S ratio and 34 S count rate, respectively, and R cor is the QSA‐corrected 34 S/ 32 S ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, it is not possible to determine primary currents <50 pA very accurately on the 7f‐GEO instrument. Therefore, the ratio of the QSA coefficient (β) to the primary ion flux ( J ) was used to facilitate the correction . β/ J values were determined for each session, via data obtained from the internal standard grains, using the relationship: Rexp=Rcor+()normalβ/J×normalSexp34 where R exp and 34 S exp are the dead‐time corrected 34 S/ 32 S ratio and 34 S count rate, respectively, and R cor is the QSA‐corrected 34 S/ 32 S ratio.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Raw isotope ratios for each grain were calculated by taking the mean 34 S − / 32 S − ion count ratio of a central area of the grain over the multiple analysis planes. Various corrections were applied to the data, including a dead‐time correction, an interpolation of 34 S − counts to align in time with those on 32 S − , and a quasi‐simultaneous arrival (QSA) effect correction . The magnitude of the QSA undercounting correction is proportional to the instrument transmission, i.e., the number of secondary ions reaching the detector per incident primary ion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Each region of interest (ROI; i.e., one individual cell) was selected using WinImage software, and all count rates were exported for all ROIs for all cycles. Electron multiplier dead time and quasi-simultaneous arrival corrections (40) were applied as necessary. For each field of view, isotope ratios for all ROIs were plotted against cycle number.…”
Section: Single-cell Metabolism During Diauxic Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%