2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the primary production routes of nickel and cobalt products used for Li-ion batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
33
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The precursors are nickel sulfate (modeled based on [36]), cobalt sulfate (modeled according to [32]), aluminum sulfate (dataset from Ecoinvent 3.4), and lithium hydroxide (dataset from Ecoinvent 3.4). According to the manufacturer, the nickel sulfate is processed from nickel class I, which is consistent with Schmidt et al [37]. The data for nickel is not taken from Ecoinvent 3.4, as the nickel metal data is based on a study with the reference year 1994, whereas the Nickel Institute released a LCI on nickel class I and ferronickel in 2015 [36].…”
Section: Positive Electrode Pastesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…The precursors are nickel sulfate (modeled based on [36]), cobalt sulfate (modeled according to [32]), aluminum sulfate (dataset from Ecoinvent 3.4), and lithium hydroxide (dataset from Ecoinvent 3.4). According to the manufacturer, the nickel sulfate is processed from nickel class I, which is consistent with Schmidt et al [37]. The data for nickel is not taken from Ecoinvent 3.4, as the nickel metal data is based on a study with the reference year 1994, whereas the Nickel Institute released a LCI on nickel class I and ferronickel in 2015 [36].…”
Section: Positive Electrode Pastesupporting
confidence: 55%
“…LiCoO 2 (LCO) has been the most investigated electrode material from the time of its earliest discovery by Goodenough et al [13]. However, despite its successful commercialization, LCO suffers from several drawbacks, e.g., structural degradation and oxygen release at highly de-lithiated states (Li 1−x CoO 2 where x > 0.5) [10,14] and low specific capacity of 140 mAh g −1 (i.e.,~half of the theoretical capacity, 274 mAh g −1 ) [15]. Besides, cobalt (Co) is very expensive and toxic, which leads to an increase in the carbon footprint of the cathode active materials [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These categories are underlined in purple in Figure 8 to highlight them. The impact on FPMF originated from the crushing step of the nickel ore during the refining and excavation processes, thereby forming fine matter particles [65]. TA is impacted due to acid leaching stages implemented during the metal refining stages of nickel, which in turn results in the increased acid consumption and disposal [65].…”
Section: Contribution Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact on FPMF originated from the crushing step of the nickel ore during the refining and excavation processes, thereby forming fine matter particles [65]. TA is impacted due to acid leaching stages implemented during the metal refining stages of nickel, which in turn results in the increased acid consumption and disposal [65]. The increase seen for HNCT is related to the coproducts that are extracted during the leaching, such as cobalt, copper, and gases like SO2 and CO2.…”
Section: Contribution Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%