2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2017.03.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the optimal detector arrangement for the helmet-chin PET – A simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is evident that the more the layers, the better resolution the system achieves. When the DOI resolution is designed to be 6.67 mm, the best spatial resolution of our dedicated brain system is achieved near the center of the FOV, which is 1.98 mm, better than the helmet‐chin system (2.5 mm with DOI resolution being 5 mm) and the HRRT system (2.5 mm with DOI resolution being 10 mm) . We then chose DOI resolution of 6.67 mm for simulations in the rest of this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It is evident that the more the layers, the better resolution the system achieves. When the DOI resolution is designed to be 6.67 mm, the best spatial resolution of our dedicated brain system is achieved near the center of the FOV, which is 1.98 mm, better than the helmet‐chin system (2.5 mm with DOI resolution being 5 mm) and the HRRT system (2.5 mm with DOI resolution being 10 mm) . We then chose DOI resolution of 6.67 mm for simulations in the rest of this work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gong et al simulated a helmet structure system that consists of six side rings with different diameters, a top panel, and a bottom panel. A slightly different helmet PET was first presented and then upgraded to the helmet‐chin system . The scanner enhances the imaging performance for both bottom and top region of the brain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All the MCE’s are tilted with their main axes pointing towards the center of the FOV in a “spherical arrangement” previously introduced by Ahmed et al . in [ 27 ] which provides a larger solid angle and, therefore, a better geometrical efficiency than a “multi-ring arrangement”. It is worth to mention that, in case of a PET system such as in [ 27 ], the geometric efficiency may increase with the square of the solid angular coverage since a valid event requires the detection of both coincident annihilation photons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have carried out a series of simulation studies to evaluate the use of the SCE gamma camera design with a spherical arrangement [ 27 ], and to compare the imaging properties offered by the non-conventional apertures with the ones offered by traditional loftholes [ 28 ]. The results show that the combination of the SCE camera design and the non-conventional micro-slit and micro-ring apertures would allow for an excellent spatial resolution and high sensitivity over a clinically relevant FOV.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%