2019
DOI: 10.1002/cnm.3263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the hemodynamic flow conditions and blood‐induced stresses inside an abdominal aortic aneurysm by means of a SPH numerical model

Abstract: The estimation of blood flow-induced loads occurring on the artery wall is affected by uncertainties hidden in the complex interaction of the pulsatile flow, the mechanical parameters of the artery, and the external support conditions. To circumvent these difficulties, a specific tool is developed by combining the aorta displacements measured by an electrocardiogram-gated-computed tomography angiography, with the blood velocity field computed by a smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH) numerical model. In the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several researchers, including our group, have shown that it is a promising method in the field of cardiovascular biomechanics. It has been used to study the mitral valve mechanics (47), left ventricular flow (29), TAVR impact on MR (8), and wall shear stress of abdominal aortic aneurysm (1). Because of the limitations of the Abaqus SPH formulation, the small-scale flow features close to the wall boundary may not be accurately resolved.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Vt Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several researchers, including our group, have shown that it is a promising method in the field of cardiovascular biomechanics. It has been used to study the mitral valve mechanics (47), left ventricular flow (29), TAVR impact on MR (8), and wall shear stress of abdominal aortic aneurysm (1). Because of the limitations of the Abaqus SPH formulation, the small-scale flow features close to the wall boundary may not be accurately resolved.…”
Section: Evaluation Of the Vt Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%