2016
DOI: 10.13053/rcs-110-1-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the Feature Selection Problem for Sentiment Analysis in Arabic Language

Abstract: Sentiment analysis, which is also known as opinion mining, can be defined as the process of the automatic detection of the attitude of an author towards a certain subject in textual contents. In this study we design and implement a document-level supervised sentiment analysis system for Arabic context and investigate its performance. We use three different feature extraction methods in order to generate three different datasets (unigrams, bigrams and trigrams) from the Opinion Corpus for Arabic (OCA). In order… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unigram represented each word as a feature. Several studies have shown that the use of unigrams was better than other 𝑛 − 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 models [17], [18] in supporting classifier performance.…”
Section: Feature Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unigram represented each word as a feature. Several studies have shown that the use of unigrams was better than other 𝑛 − 𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚 models [17], [18] in supporting classifier performance.…”
Section: Feature Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A. Nasser et al [16] execute a document level oversaw evaluation examination system for the Arabic setting. They use three assorted part extraction methods to make three datasets.…”
Section: Text Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sentiment Analysis (SA) is a subdiscipline under NLP that is focused on assigning a sentiment score to a piece of text [1][2][3]. There are mainly two approaches in SA [4]: the first is lexicon-based and uses the sentiment scores of words and phrases within the text [5], whereas the second is based on machine learning techniques [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%