2016
DOI: 10.1007/s13391-016-4010-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the effects of rear surface recombination on the Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell performances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CIGS absorber layers were deposited onto Mo-coated soda-lime glass (SLG) by a three-stage coevaporation method. Details of the deposition procedure of the CIGS have been previously described. , The target CIGS thickness was in the range of 1.5–2 μm, and the atomic compositions of Cu/(In + Ga) and Ga/(In + Ga) were maintained at 0.90 and 0.35, respectively, which are the ratios yielding the best device in our process. In situ Cs-PDT was performed by evaporating CsF under a Se atmosphere at a substrate temperature of 400 °C after the three-stage CIGS deposition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CIGS absorber layers were deposited onto Mo-coated soda-lime glass (SLG) by a three-stage coevaporation method. Details of the deposition procedure of the CIGS have been previously described. , The target CIGS thickness was in the range of 1.5–2 μm, and the atomic compositions of Cu/(In + Ga) and Ga/(In + Ga) were maintained at 0.90 and 0.35, respectively, which are the ratios yielding the best device in our process. In situ Cs-PDT was performed by evaporating CsF under a Se atmosphere at a substrate temperature of 400 °C after the three-stage CIGS deposition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simply, the chemical passivation allows for the decrease of the total number of electrically active defects. [38][39][40][41] Ultrathin devices have recently been studied in detail by numerous groups [42][43][44][45][46][47] as they have the potential to reduce the material costs and manufacturing times. Such field is beneficial for the electrical performance of the solar cell, since it drives minority carriers away from the highly recombinative rear contact into the space charge region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36,37] These findings have motivated device simulations that have predicted gains up to 3% (in absolute power conversion efficiency) in fully passivated solar cells. [38][39][40][41] Ultrathin devices have recently been studied in detail by numerous groups [42][43][44][45][46][47] as they have the potential to reduce the material costs and manufacturing times. [48] Ultrathin devices are believed to be the forward path in this CIGS technology as they enable a combination of significant advantages: (i) lower material consumption, which is of crucial industrial importance mainly due to In scarcity; (ii) increased mechanical flexibility and integration in a broad range of consumer-oriented applications (e.g., BIPV, portable electronics, wearables, internet of things, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bandgap engineering has proven to be a practical approach for achieving high photovoltaic performance in tunable bandgap solar cells, such as CIGS, 11–16 and Cu 2 ZnSn(S,Se) 4 17–21 solar cells. For example, high-performance CIGS solar cells often employ a double-graded bandgap profile, featuring a narrower bandgap in the middle of the absorber layer and wider bandgaps at the front and back sides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%