Investigation of the dependency of the drivers’ emotional experience on different road types and driving conditions

Abstract

The growing sophistication of technologies and sociological advances are major causes for the dramatic change the automotive sector is currently undergoing. To address changes from a human-centered design perspective an improved understanding of the occupants' emotional experience and behavior is required. Facial-Expression Analysis (FEA) is an emerging tool in support of such an approach, suitable for automotive research due to its noncontact application and low intrusiveness. The research described here investigated the dependency of the occupants' emotional experience on road types and driving conditions by investigating emotional responses and their causes through FEA and observational analysis. Twenty-one university students and staff were recruited for the real-time test on a planned road circuit covering different road types and conditions. Facial-expression data and video information from two in-car cameras were collected during an average driving time of 40 minutes per participant. A multi-method approach was applied for the data analysis, including both quantitative statistical analysis and qualitative observational analysis, as well as an inter-observer reliability test. Emotion frequencies were compared between the different road types, resulting in a percentage difference from the total average of emotion frequency of-6.09% below average for urban roads, +11.15% above average for major roads and +4.88% above average for rural roads. The causes most frequently assigned to the emotional responses in this dataset were poor road conditions and causes related to the navigation device. The research supported the dependency of emotional experiences on the driving condition and type of road. The study presents the first step of a human-centered design approach towards modern automotive design. The results have wide application in automotive design, applicable to the development of, for instance, an affective human-machine interaction or a personalized autonomous driving experience.

Insights on Crash Injury Severity Control from Novice and Experienced Drivers: A Bivariate Random-Effects Probit Analysis

“…is is in line with Weber et al [50], and the possibility increases about 1.6% with the driver condition varying from the normal conditions to the unknown. Although most crashes happen under apparently normal conditions, the injury severity may be more severe under unknown conditions because the unknown makes the driving condition unpredictable.…”

Ghost on the Windshield: Employing a Virtual Human Character to Communicate Pedestrian Acknowledgement and Vehicle Intention

“…In real-world traffic, it is more reasonable that a driver would be angered or surprised by a pedestrian. As a matter of fact, it has been shown that anger and surprise are among the most frequently experienced negative emotions by drivers when driving on urban roads [114]. This comes as no surprise, as urban roads are characterized by high traffic density and a plethora of situations where the reckless or inconsiderate behaviour of another road user may pose a credible danger for the driver if evasive or corrective action is not undertaken immediately [98].…”

Smiles and Angry Faces vs. Nods and Head Shakes: Facial Expressions at the Service of Autonomous Vehicles

“…On the contrary, in real-life traffic situations, it makes great sense that the reckless or inconsiderate behavior of a pedestrian would make a driver angry. In fact, previous research has shown that drivers experience anger very often when driving around the city [117]. This is to be expected, given the high traffic density that characterizes urban roads and the overabundance of situations where a driver may be delayed or even subjected to harm [99].…”