2014
DOI: 10.3151/jact.12.545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of The Bond Behaviour Between PBO-FRCM Strengthening Material and Concrete

Abstract: Fiber reinforced cementitious mortar (FRCM) systems, innovative strengthening systems, for repairing and strengthening concrete and masonry structures are an alternative option to traditional techniques such as fiber reinforced polymers (FRPs), steel plated bonding, and section enlargement. In this paper, a FRCM strengthening system made of polypara phenylene benzobisoxazole (PBO) fiber mesh embedded in cementitious matrix and bonded to concrete is investigated. There are two main parts in this paper: (i) the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Ombres (2015) conducted a few single shear tests on the interface of FRCM and concrete, and found the shear strength to be approximately 0.20 -0.75 MPa. Comparing the experimental average shear strengths from this study and those collected from the literature, Tran et al 2014, Ombres 2015, Carloni et al 2015 shows that the proposed C-FRCM composite provides the greatest bonding strength.To summarize, by assessing the flexural and compressive strengths, conductivity and shear strength of different polymer-modified inorganic cementitious matrices, the authors were able to conclude that the WC-1 ingredient had the better performance. The proposed cementitious material is electric conductive, while the mechanical properties satisfied the criteria set out in AC434 (2016) for cementitious material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, Ombres (2015) conducted a few single shear tests on the interface of FRCM and concrete, and found the shear strength to be approximately 0.20 -0.75 MPa. Comparing the experimental average shear strengths from this study and those collected from the literature, Tran et al 2014, Ombres 2015, Carloni et al 2015 shows that the proposed C-FRCM composite provides the greatest bonding strength.To summarize, by assessing the flexural and compressive strengths, conductivity and shear strength of different polymer-modified inorganic cementitious matrices, the authors were able to conclude that the WC-1 ingredient had the better performance. The proposed cementitious material is electric conductive, while the mechanical properties satisfied the criteria set out in AC434 (2016) for cementitious material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…;Ueda and Dai 2005;Tran et al 2014;Kabir et al 2016) using a 100 mm × 100 mm × 100 mm concrete cube with a 28-day strength of 49.8 MPa. Please note that the compressive strength is the average value based on five test results with the coefficient of variation of 0.016.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bonded length was a parameter investigated in most studies (D'Ambrisi et al 2012;D'Antino et al 2013D'Antino et al , 2014Sneed et al 2014;Tran et al 2014;Awani et al 2015;D'Antino et al 2015;Ombres 2015a;Sneed et al 2015;D'Antino et al 2016a;Raoof et al 2016;Sabau et al 2017). It was concluded that ultimate load and bond capacity increase nonlinearly with the bonded length.…”
Section: Bond Aspects Of Trmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And thus, the concrete/UHTCC interface becomes a weak transition face from concrete to UHTCC. In contrast, FRCM (fiber reinforced cementitious mortar) strengthening system showed several types of interface crack propagation modes due to different debonding mechanisms, including the interface debonding within the cementitious matrix, at the fiber mesh and cementitious matrix interface, at the concrete/matrix interface, and in the supporting concrete (Ortlepp et al 2006;D'Ambrisi et al 2012;Tran et al 2014).…”
Section: Interface Debonding Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%