Volume 4: Computational Fluid Dynamics, Neutronics Methods and Coupled Codes; Student Paper Competition 2006
DOI: 10.1115/icone14-89068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Swirling Flow in Rod Bundle Subchannels Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Abstract: The fluid dynamics for turbulent flow through rod bundles representative of those used in pressurized water reactors is examined using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The rod bundles of the pressurized water reactor examined in this study consist of a square array of parallel rods that are held on a constant pitch by support grids spaced axially along the rod bundle. Split-vane pair support grids are often used to create swirling flow in the rod bundle in an effort to improve the heat transfer characterist… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…14-17, although appreciable agreement of the simulation results of the RTL-K-E model with the NLS-K-E model and the SST-K-O models is evident for the mean flow parameters; wide deviation of the turbulent fluctuation is observed. Holloway et al (2006) in their investigation attributed the success of the SST-K-O model to their near wall treatment which relies on damping of the turbulent viscosity in low Reynolds number regions rather than a two layer wall treatment as implemented in the RTL-K-E model. A better prediction by the SST-K-O model and the non-linear models are also attested to in the works of Holloway et al (2006), Ruifeng et al (2012), Gandhir andHassan (2011) andHorvath andDressel (2012).…”
Section: Validation and Verification Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…14-17, although appreciable agreement of the simulation results of the RTL-K-E model with the NLS-K-E model and the SST-K-O models is evident for the mean flow parameters; wide deviation of the turbulent fluctuation is observed. Holloway et al (2006) in their investigation attributed the success of the SST-K-O model to their near wall treatment which relies on damping of the turbulent viscosity in low Reynolds number regions rather than a two layer wall treatment as implemented in the RTL-K-E model. A better prediction by the SST-K-O model and the non-linear models are also attested to in the works of Holloway et al (2006), Ruifeng et al (2012), Gandhir andHassan (2011) andHorvath andDressel (2012).…”
Section: Validation and Verification Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Several turbulence models were utilized, and subchannel geometry varied from a 5x5 subchannel layout to a single subchannel with appropriate boundary conditions and interfaces to make use of symmetry. Holloway et al (2006) [31] examined the flow downstream of a split-vane mixing spacer grid using a CFD code and comparing predictions of lateral velocities to experimentallymeasured PIV results. Fine details in the spacer grid are analyzed by using a spacer grid with weld cutouts and a spacer grid without weld cutouts at its mixing vane split pair location.…”
Section: Experimental Studies On Spacer Grid Effects On Flow Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain accurate and reliable results, the numerical computations should be performed on a high quality mesh, which is also very challenging with respect to the complex geometry of the drilling tools [28,29]. Another very important point is the choice of an appropriate turbulencemodel [23,30].…”
Section: Cfd-simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%