2010
DOI: 10.13182/nse09-45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Stochastic Radiation Transport Methods in Binary Random Heterogeneous Mixtures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A standard approach based on an ensemble average is commonly used to represent a complex aerosol deposit structure. This "atomic mix approximation" [17,18] is the fastest of all representations, but may lead to large errors if the mix material is composed of localized heavy absorbers [19]. This is unfortunately the problem with an aerosol (1 to 10 g/cm 3 ) in air (1 mg/cm 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A standard approach based on an ensemble average is commonly used to represent a complex aerosol deposit structure. This "atomic mix approximation" [17,18] is the fastest of all representations, but may lead to large errors if the mix material is composed of localized heavy absorbers [19]. This is unfortunately the problem with an aerosol (1 to 10 g/cm 3 ) in air (1 mg/cm 3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach is the so-called "chord-length sampling" [19,21], which consists of generating on the fly the particles encountered by the radiation. This generation is based on various parameters qualifying the distributions (size, shape, position, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Four primary methods have been employed to solve stochastic mixture problems; the brute force method, atomic mixing, chord length sampling, and lattice structures [10]. A variety of sensitivity studies have been performed by Liu [11,12] on particle size and temperature distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%