2015
DOI: 10.1179/1743133615y.0000000021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of solidification microstructure of single crystal CMSX-4 superalloy – experimental measurements and modelling predictions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In both the experiments and simulations, typical elongated columnar grains along the casting height were detected, independently of the process carried out. The number of these grains decreased while their transverse size increased with increasing distance from the chill plate, due to the mechanism of competitive dendrite growth, similar to the other presented investigations [3,4,5,12,16,22,33,34]. However, in the outer area of casting, the grain boundaries were inclined mainly towards the plate axis in both the simulation and experiments for the standard process without IRBs (Figure 12a–d and Figure 13a,b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In both the experiments and simulations, typical elongated columnar grains along the casting height were detected, independently of the process carried out. The number of these grains decreased while their transverse size increased with increasing distance from the chill plate, due to the mechanism of competitive dendrite growth, similar to the other presented investigations [3,4,5,12,16,22,33,34]. However, in the outer area of casting, the grain boundaries were inclined mainly towards the plate axis in both the simulation and experiments for the standard process without IRBs (Figure 12a–d and Figure 13a,b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The conventional Bridgman process has been still the most commonly used for the production of turbine blades with columnar or single crystal structure [5,8,9,13,22]. In general, in the castings produced using this process, the temperature gradient and the shape of liquidus isotherm are mainly controlled by well-known grain continuator technique [23,24,25], withdrawal rate deceleration of the mold [21,22,23,24,26,27] or using a radiation baffle placed between the heating and cooling area of the furnace [8,11]. It was found that the temperature gradient at the solidification front is the largest when the radiation baffle is perfectly adjusted to the shape of mold [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful control of solidification and heat treatment conditions is required to understand how dendritic and interdendritic regions form, and how the well-known γ/γ' microstructure evolves [11,[15][16][17][18][19][20]. In the present work, we focus on the evolution of the cast microstructure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present work, we focus on the evolution of the cast microstructure. While there is a good understanding on how large-scale (cast microstructure: dendritic and interdendritic regions, cast microporosity [21], segregation [15,[17][18][19], and defects such as freckles [22][23][24], stray grains [25,26] and slivers [27]) and small-scale heterogeneities (γ' volume fractions, γ' sizes, γ channel widths, [15,28-30]) affect performance and how they can be controlled, there is one aspect which has received insufficient attention. With other single crystals, SXs share the phenomenon of mosaicity, which was first described by C.G.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to complement the experimental study, simulation work was also conducted to study the microstructure of the as-cast alloys [16][17][18][19][20]. For instance, solidification grain structure and texture evolution of Ni-based superalloy CMSX-4 have been studied by directional solidification experiments and Pro-CAST simulation, and a good agreement between these results has been achieved by adjusting the input parameters used in ProCAST simulation [16,17]. However, the parameters used in these simulations, such as maximum nucleation density, are only adjusted manually to fit the experimental results, which may not represent the specific condition of the sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%