2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of shallow S-wave velocity structure and site response parameters in Taiwan by using high-density microtremor measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most popular techniques among various array signal analysis tools are frequency–wavenumber (F-K) and spatially autocorrelation (SPAC) (Hayashi et al, 2022). Here, we opted conventional frequency–wavenumber (CVFK) method (Bozdağ and Kocaoğlu, 2005; Chen et al, 2022; Foti et al, 2018; Lacoss et al, 1969) to extract the best dispersion curve from generated microtremor array data set. At the initial stage of array signal processing, we made attempts for the SPAC method to make a comparison with the CVFK method over extracted dispersion curves.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular techniques among various array signal analysis tools are frequency–wavenumber (F-K) and spatially autocorrelation (SPAC) (Hayashi et al, 2022). Here, we opted conventional frequency–wavenumber (CVFK) method (Bozdağ and Kocaoğlu, 2005; Chen et al, 2022; Foti et al, 2018; Lacoss et al, 1969) to extract the best dispersion curve from generated microtremor array data set. At the initial stage of array signal processing, we made attempts for the SPAC method to make a comparison with the CVFK method over extracted dispersion curves.…”
Section: Methodology and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other details about how to derive the coefficients of the nonergodic site term were discussed in Chao et al 18 While implementing this approach, it was necessary to have a large number of strong motion instruments near the target site with predicted station terms as well as their MHVRs. Nevertheless, the limitation in Taiwan is that the existing dense MHVRs 38,39 used in GMPE construction 18 are not exactly collocated with the strong motion instruments and the spatial distribution of these MHVRs is not equally distributed. To implement MHVRs to predict the site effect, in this work, several extra microtremors are used from tri-axial acceleration waveforms of twenty minutes for 254 Taiwan Strong Motion Instrumentation Program (TSMIP 40 ) stations directly from the new Taiwan Seismological and Geophysical Data Management System (GDMS-2020, https://gdmsn.cwb.gov.tw) operated by the Central Weather Bureau (CWB).…”
Section: Empirical Site Response Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition is more hazardous because the surface appears safe, but the depth of the sliding plane is a zone that can cause movement in the upper soil layers if the compact rock layer is disturbed. Information about the subsurface structure regarding seismic wave velocity distribution is crucial for understanding soil movement characteristics caused by earthquakes [15]. This research uses the microtremor method to map the soil condition potentially prone to movement or landslides based on the observed soil vulnerability index.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%