2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of sex differences in behavioural, endocrine, and neural measures following repeated psychological stressor exposure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
22
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
22
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, success rates and number of attempts began to diverge. These data are in contrast to reports of female Wistar rats showing greater locomotor effects and physiological susceptibility to chronic mild stress, such as restraint [32,33]. This discrepancy might derive from strain-and colony-dependent behavioural and physiological differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, success rates and number of attempts began to diverge. These data are in contrast to reports of female Wistar rats showing greater locomotor effects and physiological susceptibility to chronic mild stress, such as restraint [32,33]. This discrepancy might derive from strain-and colony-dependent behavioural and physiological differences.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…It is generally believed that females react more robustly to stress, both behaviourally and physiologically [13,33,54]. One reason for this sex difference is that HPA axis activity occurs as a function of ovarian cycle stage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PO exposure in F 0 males induced an avoidance phenotype similar to those found in past studies, in which we have noted that a similar repeated exposure paradigm results in increased baseline glucocorticoids and avoidance behavior (Mashoodh et al, 2008; Wright et al, 2008). In the present study, repeated exposure to PO resulted in an expected decreased preference of females for PO males relative to CO males.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Repeated exposure of prey to predators or their cues activates the HPA axis and initiates defensive behaviors (Mashoodh et al, 2008) that are long lasting, in part, through programming gene expression profiles supporting the neural circuitry of endocrine and behavioral responses to stress (Morrow et al, 2002; Wright et al, 2008, 2012; Roth et al, 2011). PO exposure in F 0 males induced an avoidance phenotype similar to those found in past studies, in which we have noted that a similar repeated exposure paradigm results in increased baseline glucocorticoids and avoidance behavior (Mashoodh et al, 2008; Wright et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habituation is a primitive form of non-associative learning and is an important means of allowing rodents to resume foraging and other appetitive behaviors following an encounter with a predator or predator-related cues [25]. However, our findings conflict with a previous report that found that defensive behavioral responses did not habituate, even after repeated presentation of a piece of cat collar over three weeks [26]. It is possible that odors associated with cat skin or fur are more potent than cat feces because they represent a more direct danger [3] so that the voles exposed to cat feces in our experiment habituated more readily than those exposed to a piece of cat collar.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%