2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2015.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Rickettsia, Coxiella burnetii and Bartonella in ticks from animals in South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We could not find reports of tick infections with C. burnetii in South Africa prior to our previously published study (Mtshali et al 2015 ), where we positively identified the pathogen in KZN and the FS from ticks collected from ruminants (sheep, goats and cattle) with infection rates ranging between 20% and 68% among the sampled groups. In a similar study, Halajian et al ( 2016 ) could not detect C. burnetii infections in sheep, cattle and wildlife in Limpopo and Western Cape provinces. Nevertheless, in this study we report a notably high prevalence of 41% when compared with 7.8% found in a similar study in Cyprus (Psaroulaki et al 2006 ) as well as to the above-mentioned studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We could not find reports of tick infections with C. burnetii in South Africa prior to our previously published study (Mtshali et al 2015 ), where we positively identified the pathogen in KZN and the FS from ticks collected from ruminants (sheep, goats and cattle) with infection rates ranging between 20% and 68% among the sampled groups. In a similar study, Halajian et al ( 2016 ) could not detect C. burnetii infections in sheep, cattle and wildlife in Limpopo and Western Cape provinces. Nevertheless, in this study we report a notably high prevalence of 41% when compared with 7.8% found in a similar study in Cyprus (Psaroulaki et al 2006 ) as well as to the above-mentioned studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Although previous studies from Nigeria reported ticks to be infected with Coxiella spp. [9,10], a recent study carried out in South Africa to detect tick-borne pathogens failed to detect Coxiella spp from a wide range of ticks tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [36]. Even though several species of tick can be naturally infected with C. burnetii, they are however not important in the maintenance of infections in livestock or humans compared to wild vertebrates [37].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent progress in understanding Coxiella pathogenesis, host mechanisms associated with the control of infection and bacterial factors implicated in replication and establishment of infection remain largely unknown. Although C. burnetii has been detected in tick populations worldwide (19)(20)(21), the role of ticks in the epidemiology of Q fever remains unclear (22). A recent study demonstrated that C. burnetii has emerged from Coxiellalike endosymbiont organisms found in ticks, revealing evidence of how the bacterium evolved from arthropods to infect mammalian cells by the acquisition of virulence factors (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%