2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10040-015-1323-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of recharge dynamics and flow paths in a fractured crystalline aquifer in semi-arid India using borehole logs: implications for managed aquifer recharge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where groundwater is not exploited, crystalline-rock aquifers can contribute significantly to baseflow (e.g. Kosugi et al 2006;Cai and Ofterdinger 2016;Comte et al 2019;Zhao et al 2019); however, as groundwater is increasingly abstracted and water levels fall, flow can become compartmentalised, depending on the presence and nature of fractures at depth (Perrin et al 2011b;Guihéneuf et al 2014;Alazard et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where groundwater is not exploited, crystalline-rock aquifers can contribute significantly to baseflow (e.g. Kosugi et al 2006;Cai and Ofterdinger 2016;Comte et al 2019;Zhao et al 2019); however, as groundwater is increasingly abstracted and water levels fall, flow can become compartmentalised, depending on the presence and nature of fractures at depth (Perrin et al 2011b;Guihéneuf et al 2014;Alazard et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Basic events that can lead to MAR failure were compiled based on a literature review of the problems encountered by different facilities around the world (Aiken and Kuniansky, 2002;Alazard et al, 2016;Assmuth et al, 2016;Bhusari et al, 2016;Chaoka et al, 2006;Flint and Ellett, 2005;Masetti et al, 2016;Murray and Ravenscroft, 2010;Petersen and Glotzbach, 2005;Schneider et al, 1987;Izbicki et al, 2006;Sultana and Ahmed, 2016;Tredoux et al, 2009;Tredoux and Cain, 2010;Tripathi, 2016). We revised 51 MAR facilities at 47 sites (some sites involved more than one facility) located in different countries and climatic conditions worldwide: Australia, Belgium, Botswana, China, Finland, France, Germany, India, Israel, Italy, Jordan, Namibia, South Africa, Spain, Tunisia, and USA.…”
Section: Literature Review -Events Involved In Mar Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common identified technical risks for MAR facilities (e.g., Asano and Cotruvo, 2004;Gale et al, 2006;Leviston et al, 2006;Maliva and Missimer, 2012) are those related to the following: (i) the operation of the facility (low recovery rates, clogging, mechanical or structural damage, low storage efficiency, high energy consumption); (ii) water quality, either recharged or extracted; (iii) hydraulic engineering impacts, such as rock fracturing, subsidence, or host porous media dissolution; and (iv) environmental impacts, including reduced water outflow to springs and rivers, proliferation of pests and odors, and the impact on aquiferdependent ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%