2013
DOI: 10.1063/1.4844015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of radiation flux in certain band via the preheat of aluminum sample

Abstract: Quantitative evaluation of the fractions of high energy x-rays in a hohlraum is crucial to the indirect driven-drive scheme of inertial confinement fusion and many other applications in high energy density physics. Preheat of a sample due to x-rays sensitively depends on optical thin photons. Analyzing the motion of a sample due to preheat can thus provide valuable information of those x-rays. In this article, we propose a method to infer the temporal evolution of the x-ray fluxes in the bands of our interest.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By dividing the incident radiation source into a low frequency Planckian and a high frequency Gaussian distribution, the shock velocities can be obtained through radiation hydrodynamic simulations and the M-band fraction can be obtained along with the radiation temperature. Analyzing the motion of a sample due to preheat has also been used to provide information on the fraction of soft and hard x-rays in the source [10]. To determine the rear surface spectral temperature, the spectral intensity averaged over a 200 ps window at the time of shock breakout was compared to a Planck form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By dividing the incident radiation source into a low frequency Planckian and a high frequency Gaussian distribution, the shock velocities can be obtained through radiation hydrodynamic simulations and the M-band fraction can be obtained along with the radiation temperature. Analyzing the motion of a sample due to preheat has also been used to provide information on the fraction of soft and hard x-rays in the source [10]. To determine the rear surface spectral temperature, the spectral intensity averaged over a 200 ps window at the time of shock breakout was compared to a Planck form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preheating ahead of the shock front also causes significant shock propagation variation in the capsule thereby reducing the final yield [14]. As the rear surface of the foil expands due to preheating, large uncertainties in EOS diagnostics creep in [10]. Preheating also makes it difficult to maintain a low adiabat in ICF capsules thereby requiring much higher implosion kinetic energy [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The front surface of target is covered by 300 nm thick Al foil to prevent direct laser penetration. While half of the rear surface is coated with 3 µm of Al as a preheat tracer [33][34][35]. This tracer could avoid preheat induced blinding inside GDP and give a reliable shock breakout time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%