2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10971-015-3746-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of photocatalytic and dielectric behavior of LaFeO3 nanoparticles prepared by microwave-assisted sol–gel combustion route

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar dielectric response behavior has also been seen in LaFeO 3 in studies reported by Gaikwad et al . 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar dielectric response behavior has also been seen in LaFeO 3 in studies reported by Gaikwad et al . 43 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fig. 3(e), LaFeO3 obtained via a combined microwave-assisted sol-gel method showed enhanced photoactivity for methylene blue decolorization [204]. The microwave assisted technique come into view as a new synthesis method and greatly explored in the terms of organic/inorganic synthesis owing to the diverse benefits like quick reaction time, homogeneous microwaving, along with the green and proficient energy purpose [205].…”
Section: Microwave-assisted Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, there is neither polar-catastrophe-dominated nor redox-reaction-mediated charge transfers across the LFO/STO interface when the LFO layer is thin. Based on the polar catastrophe model, the critical thickness of LFO ( l LFO ) for triggering the interlayer charge transfer between polar LFO and nonpolar STO is about 20 nm (50 uc), which can be estimated by l LFO = ε 0 ε LFO Δ E g / eP LFO 0 , where ε 0 is the vacuum permittivity, ε LFO = 120 , is the relative permittivity of LFO, e is the elementary charge, P LFO 0 is the formal polarization of LFO, and Δ E g (∼3.2 eV) is the energy difference between the valence band of LFO and the conduction band of STO. In the view of oxygen affinity, LFO cannot take the oxygen from STO to induce the interfacial redox reaction, resulting in preservation of the insulating nature at the STO interface .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%