Propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) has been reported to improve
long-term outcome following cancer surgery, when compared with inhalation
agents. However, such investigational reports are still controversial, and no
studies have been conducted in relation to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
surgery. The present study aimed to compare the favorable effects of TIVA versus
inhalation agents on recurrence-free survival and overall survival after
curative resection of NSCLC. This retrospective cohort study examined medical
records of the patients who were diagnosed with NSCLC and underwent curative
resection at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital from August 2003 to July
2012. The primary outcome included the comparison of postoperative overall
survival and recurrence-free survival in both groups. To balance the 2 groups
for analysis, a propensity matching method was used, and stratified Cox
proportional hazard models were used for statistical analysis. This study
included 943 cases of NSCLC for final analysis, and the cases were divided into
the TIVA group (n = 749) and inhalation group (n = 194). Propensity matching
produced 196 patients in each group. The final analysis revealed no significant
difference in the hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence between the TIVA and
inhalation groups (P = .233). The HR for death between the 2
groups was not significantly different either (P = .551). In
this study, we found no benefit of propofol-based TIVA for long-term oncologic
outcome after NSCLC surgery, relative to inhalation agents.