2013
DOI: 10.1021/om301250v
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Monomeric versus Dimericfac-Rhenium(I) Tricarbonyl Systems Containing the Noninnocent 8-Oxyquinolate Ligand

Abstract: Synthesis and characterization of the dimeric [fac-Re(R-OQN)(CO) 3 ] 2 and monomeric fac-Re(R-OQN)-(CO) 3 (CH 3 CN) complexes are reported where R = unsubstituted, 2-methyl, 5,7-dimethyl, or 5-fluoro and OQN = 8oxyquinolate. Facile solvolysis of the dimeric systems is observed in coordinating media quantitatively yielding the monomer complexes in situ. Due to poor synthetic yields of the dimeric precursors, a direct synthetic strategy for isolation of the acetonitrile monomer complexes with an improved yield w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the effect of the difference in charge density on the metal, the Re1-N4(ACN) bond distance in (2) [2.181 (4) Å ] is similar within 3 to those reported for the neutral complexes [Re(ACN)(L)(CO) 3 ] (L is an 8-oxyquinolate-type ligand; Zhao et al, 2013) and [Re(ACN) 2 (trifluoroacetato-O)(CO) 3 ] (Kia & Fun, 2008), while being longer than in the cationic complex [Re(bpy)(ACN)(CO) 3 ] + [bpy is 2,2 0bipyridine; 2.140 (3) Å ; Chen et al, 2003]. The same type of comparison for (3) shows the Re1-O8(DMSO) bond [2.218 (3) Å ] to be longer than in the corresponding cationic complex [Re(bpy)(DMSO)(CO) 3 ] + (Casanova et al, 2006), as expected.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Consistent with the effect of the difference in charge density on the metal, the Re1-N4(ACN) bond distance in (2) [2.181 (4) Å ] is similar within 3 to those reported for the neutral complexes [Re(ACN)(L)(CO) 3 ] (L is an 8-oxyquinolate-type ligand; Zhao et al, 2013) and [Re(ACN) 2 (trifluoroacetato-O)(CO) 3 ] (Kia & Fun, 2008), while being longer than in the cationic complex [Re(bpy)(ACN)(CO) 3 ] + [bpy is 2,2 0bipyridine; 2.140 (3) Å ; Chen et al, 2003]. The same type of comparison for (3) shows the Re1-O8(DMSO) bond [2.218 (3) Å ] to be longer than in the corresponding cationic complex [Re(bpy)(DMSO)(CO) 3 ] + (Casanova et al, 2006), as expected.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The reactions were followed focusing on the downfield signal belonging pyridyl H6 atom. acetonitrile at reflux for 24 h. [49] The IR spectra of these complexes matched identically to that of the final species observed in the ligand exchange of both Re(1)(CO)3Cl and Re(1)(CO)3Br (see Figures S18-19). Photochemical studies were conducted on both Re(1)(CO)3Cl and Re(1)(CO)3Br using the same conditions as previously reported for Re-NHC complexes.…”
Section: Ground State Ligand Exchange Reactionssupporting
confidence: 53%
“…The presence of -NH 2 groups and ReTC in Re-MOF-NH 2 (X%) was confirmed through IR spectra (Figs 2e and S6 in the Supplementary Information). The peak at 1655 cm −1 was assigned to the N-H bending mode of the -NH 2 functional group, while those at 2022, 1920, and 1910 cm −1 correspond to the C≡O stretching ones of ReTC 9 , 23 . In addition, the UV-vis spectra and XPS results of Re-MOF-NH 2 (X%) support the presence of ReTC, BPDC-(NH 2 ) 2 , and BPDC (Figs S7 and S8 in the Supplementary Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%