2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12666-020-01945-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Residual Stress in Non-equal-Channel Angular Pressing of 6061 Aluminum Alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25 The CGP method is one of these methods. In other processes of SPD too, residual stresses have been evaluated, including equal channel angular rolling (ECAR), 28 non-equal channel angular pressing (NECAP), 29 and cyclic close die forging (CCDF). 30,31…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The CGP method is one of these methods. In other processes of SPD too, residual stresses have been evaluated, including equal channel angular rolling (ECAR), 28 non-equal channel angular pressing (NECAP), 29 and cyclic close die forging (CCDF). 30,31…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9] In recent years, SPD techniques are widely applied in producing the UFG structures in bulk metallic alloys. [10][11][12][13][14] Equal channel angular pressing (ECAP), 15,16 high pressure torsion (HPT), equal channel angular rolling (ECAR), [18][19][20] constrained groove pressing, [21][22][23][24][25] non-equal channel angular pressing 26 and cyclic close die forging (CCDF) 27 are some of the SPD processes which have been recently investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, the study of the effect of the SPD process on RS formation and distribution has become an interesting subject. In this field, several methods were used such as ring-core, 36 slitting, [37][38] contour, 35,39 hole-drilling, 40 etc. Although different techniques were developed to measure the RS, just a few methods are suitable for through-thickness measurement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%