2018
DOI: 10.1016/s1876-3804(18)30099-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of microscopic pore structure variations of shale due to hydration effects through SEM fixed-point observation experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies have indicated that the physical and chemical properties differ significantly according to mineral types and clay minerals are more active. For example, clay minerals mainly correlate with smaller pores; smectite and I/S are easier to hydrate and swell than illite and kaolinite (Zolfaghari et al, 2016;Al-Ameri et al, 2018;Sui et al, 2018), and their higher CEC will lead to stronger impacts on the chemical properties of flowback water (Greenland, 1971;Han et al, 2016;Saidian et al, 2016;Zolfaghari et al, 2016); along with burial evolution, smectite with large ISA will transfer to illite with no ISA by illitization, leading to the decreasing of ISA (Zhu et al, 2015;Wilson et al, 2016b;Singh et al, 2016) and the change of pore structure and BET-SSA (Wu et al, 2015;Wang and Guo, 2019). These differences will result in divergences in the interactions between pore walls and fluids and then affect the fluid flow significantly.…”
Section: Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous studies have indicated that the physical and chemical properties differ significantly according to mineral types and clay minerals are more active. For example, clay minerals mainly correlate with smaller pores; smectite and I/S are easier to hydrate and swell than illite and kaolinite (Zolfaghari et al, 2016;Al-Ameri et al, 2018;Sui et al, 2018), and their higher CEC will lead to stronger impacts on the chemical properties of flowback water (Greenland, 1971;Han et al, 2016;Saidian et al, 2016;Zolfaghari et al, 2016); along with burial evolution, smectite with large ISA will transfer to illite with no ISA by illitization, leading to the decreasing of ISA (Zhu et al, 2015;Wilson et al, 2016b;Singh et al, 2016) and the change of pore structure and BET-SSA (Wu et al, 2015;Wang and Guo, 2019). These differences will result in divergences in the interactions between pore walls and fluids and then affect the fluid flow significantly.…”
Section: Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These divergences will change the distribution, occlusion, and flow of fracturing fluid and oil. Furthermore, water is the main component in fracturing fluids, and it will interact with clay minerals (especially I/S) significantly during the pumping, flowback, and production stages (O'Brien and Chenevert, 1973;Makhanov et al, 2014;Xu and Dehghanpour, 2014;Sui et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2020) and might lead to the low flowback recovery, the changes of pore and surface properties, and the reduction of oil relative permeability. Therefore, characteristics and properties of pores and surfaces are the indispensable factors that need to be taken into the evaluation of shale oil potential.…”
Section: Significances and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Identifying pore types is the basis for studying the microscopic pore structure of reservoirs. Some previous studies have pointed out that most pore systems in shale are micro pores, so they can not be seen by OM [31][32][33]. However, different types of pores can be revealed by high-precision scanning images.…”
Section: Pore Structure Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qian et al (2017) used nuclear magnetic resonance and CT scanning technology carried out core hydration experiments under the condition of 10 MPa confining pressure and studied the effect of hydration on the pore fracture structure of shale. Sui et al (2018) based on the hydration experiment of 4 different types of shale outcrop rock samples and used the field emission scanning electron microscope to conduct fixedpoint observation and comparative analysis of the microscopic pore changes before and after the hydration of the experimental sample. Xue et al (2018) used field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) to microscopically characterize shale samples before and after hydration and used the micro-CT scan, porosity, and permeability test experiments to study the difference between physical parameters and the microstructure of the original sample, saturated water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%