2007
DOI: 10.1080/02533839.2007.9671267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of meditation scenario by quantifying the complexity index of EEG

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion criteria were sufficient sample size (n > 6), report of statistical analyses, description of the directionality of changes, and a relevant contrast (contrasting a similar condition between two groups or contrasting two conditions within one group). We excluded 3 studies due to small sample size (n=3: Davis et al, 2020;n=2: Lin & Li, 2017;n=2: Pradhan & Narayana Dutt, 1995), 4 studies that utilized complexity-related measures in meditation for machine learning classifiers and reported classification accuracy but did not report any descriptive analysis on the directionality of change in complexity (Han et al, 2020;Jachs, 2022;Korde et al, 2018;Pandey et al, 2023), 6 studies which reported results but did not apply basic statistical significance testing (Harne, 2014;Kamthekar & Iyer, 2021;Kaur et al, 2017;Motghare & Thorat, 2018;Lo & Huang, 2007;Pandey & Miyapuram, 2021) and 2 studies contrasting a condition of experienced meditators during meditation vs. resting state of controls, which is an irrelevant contrast for our purposes 4 (Huang & Lo, 2009;Shaw & Routray, 2016).…”
Section: A Systematic Review Of Complexity In Meditationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria were sufficient sample size (n > 6), report of statistical analyses, description of the directionality of changes, and a relevant contrast (contrasting a similar condition between two groups or contrasting two conditions within one group). We excluded 3 studies due to small sample size (n=3: Davis et al, 2020;n=2: Lin & Li, 2017;n=2: Pradhan & Narayana Dutt, 1995), 4 studies that utilized complexity-related measures in meditation for machine learning classifiers and reported classification accuracy but did not report any descriptive analysis on the directionality of change in complexity (Han et al, 2020;Jachs, 2022;Korde et al, 2018;Pandey et al, 2023), 6 studies which reported results but did not apply basic statistical significance testing (Harne, 2014;Kamthekar & Iyer, 2021;Kaur et al, 2017;Motghare & Thorat, 2018;Lo & Huang, 2007;Pandey & Miyapuram, 2021) and 2 studies contrasting a condition of experienced meditators during meditation vs. resting state of controls, which is an irrelevant contrast for our purposes 4 (Huang & Lo, 2009;Shaw & Routray, 2016).…”
Section: A Systematic Review Of Complexity In Meditationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although EEG signals during meditation has been studied in the past [10][11][12][13], there remains a lack of significant effort on classifying these signals during rest and meditation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%