“…The inclusion criteria were sufficient sample size (n > 6), report of statistical analyses, description of the directionality of changes, and a relevant contrast (contrasting a similar condition between two groups or contrasting two conditions within one group). We excluded 3 studies due to small sample size (n=3: Davis et al, 2020;n=2: Lin & Li, 2017;n=2: Pradhan & Narayana Dutt, 1995), 4 studies that utilized complexity-related measures in meditation for machine learning classifiers and reported classification accuracy but did not report any descriptive analysis on the directionality of change in complexity (Han et al, 2020;Jachs, 2022;Korde et al, 2018;Pandey et al, 2023), 6 studies which reported results but did not apply basic statistical significance testing (Harne, 2014;Kamthekar & Iyer, 2021;Kaur et al, 2017;Motghare & Thorat, 2018;Lo & Huang, 2007;Pandey & Miyapuram, 2021) and 2 studies contrasting a condition of experienced meditators during meditation vs. resting state of controls, which is an irrelevant contrast for our purposes 4 (Huang & Lo, 2009;Shaw & Routray, 2016).…”