2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11083600
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Magnetic Anisotropy and Barkhausen Noise Asymmetry Resulting from Uniaxial Plastic Deformation of Steel S235

Abstract: This study investigates alterations in magnetic anisotropy and the marked asymmetry in Barkhausen noise (MBN) signals after the uniaxial plastic straining of steel S235 obtained from a shipyard and used as standard structural steel in shipbuilding. It was found that the initial easy axis of magnetisation in the direction of previous rolling, and also in the direction of loading, becomes the hard axis of magnetisation as soon as the plastic strain attains the critical threshold. This behaviour is due to the pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect was also observed in an amorphous bilayer ribbon (Fe73.5Nb3Si13.5B9Cu1/Fe74.5Nb3Si13.5B9) consisting of two layers of different magnetic hardness [22]. Similar behaviour was reported with respect to plastic deformation under the uniaxial tensile test when this asymmetry is produced as a result of heterogeneity in dislocation density among the neighbouring grains and the associated differences in magnetic hardness of mutually-coupled grains [23].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This effect was also observed in an amorphous bilayer ribbon (Fe73.5Nb3Si13.5B9Cu1/Fe74.5Nb3Si13.5B9) consisting of two layers of different magnetic hardness [22]. Similar behaviour was reported with respect to plastic deformation under the uniaxial tensile test when this asymmetry is produced as a result of heterogeneity in dislocation density among the neighbouring grains and the associated differences in magnetic hardness of mutually-coupled grains [23].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This effect was also observed in an amorphous bilayer ribbon (Fe73.5Nb3Si13.5B9Cu1/Fe74.5Nb3Si13.5B9) consisting of two layers of different magnetic hardness [22]. Similar behavior was reported with respect to plastic deformation under the uniaxial tensile test when this asymmetry was produced as a result of heterogeneity in dislocation density among neighboring grains and the associated differences in magnetic hardness of mutually coupled grains [23].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Under field conditions, influence factors, for instance, temperature, working stress, residual stress, elastoplastic deformation of the material itself [ 25 , 26 ], and even material micro-structure [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 14 , 15 ], are usually accompanied. Moreover, influence factors not only reduce the detection accuracy but are also difficult to separate from the detection target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%