1995
DOI: 10.1007/bf01666186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of lignin models of the biphenyl type by X-ray crystallography and NMR spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lowest energy conformer of DBDO alongside its chemical structure is shown in Figure a. It is in agreement with X‐ray data of similar molecules . One methoxy group is not planar with the ring to which it is attached; this seems to be due to steric hindrance with the G‐ring.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lowest energy conformer of DBDO alongside its chemical structure is shown in Figure a. It is in agreement with X‐ray data of similar molecules . One methoxy group is not planar with the ring to which it is attached; this seems to be due to steric hindrance with the G‐ring.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is in agreement with X-ray data of similar molecules. [50,51] One methoxy group is not planar with the ring to which it is attached; this seems to be due to steric hindrance with the G-ring. However, this is in contradiction to the aforementioned X-ray studies, where the aryl-methoxy groups are always found to be in plane with the ring.…”
Section: Molecular Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another 13 C NMR study confirmed these data (Capanema et al 2004). In contrast, it is difficult to validate these data because of the overlapping NMR signals of biphenyl structures with other signals (Brunow et al 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…13 C NMR studies also indicated that 0.24-0.26 per C 6 -C 3 unit (Drumond et al 1989) and 0.24-0.27 per C 6 -C 3 unit (Capanema et al 2004) were involved in the biphenyl structures in spruce MWLs. Brunow et al (1995) pointed out the difficulty in validating the biphenyl content determined by 13 C NMR analysis due to the overlap of the NMR signals of biphenyl structures with other signals. Such a signal overlap may possibly lead to an overestimation of the biphenyl content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%