2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.02.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of injury severities in single-vehicle crashes in North Carolina using mixed logit models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1974, UT began to be widely used in transportation, and McFadden [17] proposed the multinomial logit model (MNL), which further refned the theory of random utility maximization (RUM). Subsequently, the form of MNL models has been gradually expanded to more fexible nested logit (NL) models [18], mixed logit (ML) models [19], latent class logit models (LCM) [20], and so on. Currently, UT is often applied to travel route choice behavior in transportation travel behavior.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1974, UT began to be widely used in transportation, and McFadden [17] proposed the multinomial logit model (MNL), which further refned the theory of random utility maximization (RUM). Subsequently, the form of MNL models has been gradually expanded to more fexible nested logit (NL) models [18], mixed logit (ML) models [19], latent class logit models (LCM) [20], and so on. Currently, UT is often applied to travel route choice behavior in transportation travel behavior.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As seen in Table 1 , some earlier studies investigated the contributing factors to injury severity in single-vehicle crashes using aggregate crash data 7 15 . In contrast, other research studies analyzed single-vehicle crash-injury severities using disaggregated data; for example, crashes on divided/undivided urban road 16 , crashes on rural/urban roadways 17 , crashes involving unimpaired/alcohol-impaired/drug-impaired drivers 18 , crashes with one-/two-/three-occupants 19 , riders/drivers of the crashes 20 , crashes on 2-lane/4-lane roadway 21 , crashes with difference light/weather condition 22 , familiar/unfamiliar drivers of the crashes 23 , passenger car/SUV crashes 24 , crashes under different weather scenarios 25 , 26 , fixed-object/overturn crashes 27 , crashes on arterial/ secondary/branch roadway 28 , and crashes from different period (temporal instability) 4 , 29 34 . However, none of the aforementioned literature investigated single-vehicle crashes using disaggregated data concerning restrained and unrestrained drivers, while also accounting for their speeding violation behavior in the crashes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such fact has driven the development of statistical techniques to identify the unobserved heterogeneity. To accommodate the discrete nature of crash severity (no injury, slight injury, serious injury, and fatality), various regression approaches-random parameters logit (RP-logit) model [38,39], random parameters probit model [40], random intercept logit model [41], latent class logit model [10], and finite mixture random parameters model [16,42]-have been widely recommended due to their high flexibility [43][44][45]. Alternatively, random parameters ordered logit model [46] and random parameters ordered probit model [47] were applied to handle the intuitive ordering of crash severity.…”
Section: Statistical Techniques For Unobserved Heterogeneity and Spatial Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%