Investigation of influence of particle characteristics on the non‐coaxiality of anisotropic granular materials using DEM

Abstract

Summary As a result of deposition process and particle characteristics, granular materials can be inherently anisotropic. Many researchers have strongly suggested that the inherent anisotropy is the main reason for the deformation non‐coaxiality of granular materials. However, their relationships are not unanimous because of the limited understanding of the non‐coaxial micro‐mechanism. In this study, we investigated the influence of inherent anisotropy on the non‐coaxial angle using the discrete element method. Firstly, we developed a new discrete element method approach using rough elliptic particles and proposed a novel method to produce anisotropic specimens. Secondly, the effects of initial specimen density and particle characteristics, such as particle aspect ratio Am, rolling resistance coefficient β, and bedding plane orientation δ, were examined by a series of biaxial tests and rotational principal axes tests. Findings from the numerical simulations are summarized as follows: (1) the peak internal friction angle ϕp and the non‐coaxial angle i both increase with the initial density, Am and β, and they both increase initially and then decrease with δ in the range of 0–90°; (2) among the particle characteristics, the influence of Am is the most significant; and (3) for anisotropic specimens, the non‐coaxial angle can be calculated using the double slip and rotation rate model. Then, an empirical formula was proposed based on the simulation results to depict the relationship between the non‐coaxial angle and the particle characteristics. Finally, the particle‐scale mechanism of non‐coaxiality for granular materials was discussed from the perspective of energy dissipation. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

On the kinematics and dynamics of crystal‐rich systems

“…This poses challenges for the description of granular materials as a (plastic) continuum, where the usual assumption of stress and strain coaxiality is required to formulate the constitutive closures [Hill, 1950]. Noncoaxiality between contact or shape, and force, normals arises through interactions involving grain-scale properties such as variable shape and friction [Ai et al, 2014;Jiang et al, 2017;Zhao and Guo, 2015], perhaps similar to noncoaxiality observed in simulations of melt-present processes in the Earth's mantle with viscosity heterogeneity [Butler, 2012;Katz et al, 2006]. To quantify this anisotropy, a description of the microstructure is required.…”

Multi-objective optimization-based updating of predictions during excavation

“…Some studies (Kung et al, 2007;Kung et al, 2009;Schädlich and Schweiger, 2012), have innovatively considered the small strain stiffness behavior of soils and obtained accurate predictions. In addition, due to its natural deposition, the soil always exhibits naturally inherent cross-anisotropy of elasticity (Jiang et al, 2016a;Jiang et al, 2017), which has a significant effect on lateral wall deflection and ground movement in an excavation (Jiang et al, 2016b;Teng et al, 2014). Due to the integrity that exists between the soil and the structure in an excavation, associating the structures' parameters (e.g., stiffness of the diagram wall, of supporting structures) with the soil parameters in the optimization could give more accurate predictions of the wall and ground responses.…”