2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of in vitro anticancer and DNA strap interactions in live cells using carboplatin type Cu(II) and Zn(II) metalloinsertors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Metalloinserters and metallointercalators exploit noncovalent interactions of planar aromatic ligands to inhibit DNA repair because they show unwinding of DNA to π-stack between base pairs, groove binding, or insertion into a destabilized site (12,13). Covalent interactions can be used to directly bind complexes to the DNA duplex whereas the ligands may be functionalized for subsequent reactions such as radicalinduced DNA cleavage (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Complexes using these mechanisms often demonstrate inhibition of DNA replication, leading to G2 arrest to halt progression of the damaged DNA during the cell cycle; however, many suffer from lengthy reaction times of up to 48 h or inefficient DNA degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metalloinserters and metallointercalators exploit noncovalent interactions of planar aromatic ligands to inhibit DNA repair because they show unwinding of DNA to π-stack between base pairs, groove binding, or insertion into a destabilized site (12,13). Covalent interactions can be used to directly bind complexes to the DNA duplex whereas the ligands may be functionalized for subsequent reactions such as radicalinduced DNA cleavage (14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Complexes using these mechanisms often demonstrate inhibition of DNA replication, leading to G2 arrest to halt progression of the damaged DNA during the cell cycle; however, many suffer from lengthy reaction times of up to 48 h or inefficient DNA degradation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that the obtained products constitutea ni mportant class of building block for the synthesis of biologically and pharmaceutically relevant compounds. [33] For other enol carboxylates such as ethyl 3-acetyloxy-3-(phenyl)prop-2-enoate (5d;R 1 = C 6 H 5 ,R 2 = OEt, R 3 = Me) and 3-acetyloxy-3-(4-mehoxyphenyl)prop-2-enoate( 5e;R 1 = 4-MeOC 6 H 4 , R 2 = OEt, R 3 = Me), the reaction also proceed smoothly providing products 6a-f with the yields up to 72 % ( Figure 3). Electron-rich aldehydes gave higher yields than their electron-deficient counterparts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the abovementioned results, we hypothesized that Zn(TAC) would have stronger tumor growth inhibition (TGI, %) compared with an equivalent treatment regimen with Zn(TA) and the clinical drug cisplatin. To test this, we used a human-relevant lung pneumocyte cancer cell line for treatment with Zn(TA) and Zn(TAC) via intraperitoneal injection 93–100 as well as an A549/DDP cell line xenograft model. Tumor regression (TGI = 57.4%) was observed in the A549/DDP xenograft model with Zn(TAC) after an intraperitoneal injection of Zn(TA) (2.0 mg kg −1 ) or Zn(TAC) (2.0 mg kg −1 ) every 2 days (q2d) for 15 days (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%