2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2022.117477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of hydrogenation and mass transfer performance in micropacked beds with highly active monolithic catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Micro‐packed bed reactors (μPBRs), as the typical representative of multiphase packed bed reactors, were filled with the various solid particles randomly or structured elements systematically 1–3 . In μPBRs, the particle diameters were usually smaller than 500 μm and gas and liquid flow in the co‐current mode was operated 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micro‐packed bed reactors (μPBRs), as the typical representative of multiphase packed bed reactors, were filled with the various solid particles randomly or structured elements systematically 1–3 . In μPBRs, the particle diameters were usually smaller than 500 μm and gas and liquid flow in the co‐current mode was operated 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The suspension in the pores of NFs can be blown out by air circulation. 43 However, at a high suspension flow rate (from 162 to 198 mL min −1 ), the decrease in loading weight was insignificant by increasing the flow rate. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…According to our previous study, the common experimental conditions were chosen for comparing the catalysts with various preparation methods and loading weights of coatings. 43 The reaction temperature, system pressure, AMS initial concentration, and gas flow rate were set as 70 °C, 1.0 MPa, 10 wt%, and 20 mL min −1 , respectively. The liquid flow rate of 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 mL min −1 was chosen for the experiments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the two catalysts had similar Pd nanoparticle sizes and loadings, the results was attributed to the different mass transfer efficiencies for various wettability catalysts. Ma et al 26 prepared the Pd/nickel foam catalysts with different coating materials and measured the mass transfer and reaction performance by α‐methylstyrene (AMS) hydrogenation. The experimental results showed that hydrophobic CeO 2 coating had higher conversion of AMS and ( ka ) OV compared with the hydrophilic Al 2 O 3 coating.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%