Investigation of Hamming, Reed-Solomon, and Turbo Forward Error Correcting Codes

Abstract

Sensors and Electron Devices Directorate, ARLApproved for public release; distribution unlimited. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense, Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports (0704-0188), 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number. ii REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE

Indoor user navigation for CA in LTE‐advanced

“…There are many factors that may change the BER at the PHY layer. For example, when M-quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) is selected, an approximation of the BER can be found in [26]. In fact, the BER also depends on the code type, code-word length, and code rate.…”

Performance of Cognitive Hybrid Automatic Repeat reQuest: Stop-and-Wait

“…It first senses a PR channel and, if finds it free, it accesses the channel and transmits packets using our CSW-HARQ scheme. In this paper, Reed-Solomon (RS) codes are used for error correction and detection [24]- [26]. We investigate both by analysis and simulations both the achievable throughput and delay performance of CSW-HARQ.…”