2023
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.22-0625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Four Cases of Stevens–Johnson Syndrome among Participants in a Mass Drug Administration Campaign with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine and Primaquine in Haiti, 2020

Abstract: In 2018, a mass drug administration (MDA) campaign for malaria elimination was piloted in Haiti. The pilot treated 36,338 people with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) and primaquine; no severe adverse events were detected. In 2020, another MDA campaign using the same medications was implemented to mitigate an upsurge in malaria cases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Four cases of Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) were identified among the 42,249 people who took the medications. Three of these individuals required hosp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a similar MDA campaign in 2020 identified four cases of SCARs, which raises concerns about using SP for MDA during the current pandemic. 44 Last, there was no change in parasite prevalence or seroprevalence at 10 weeks after the campaign compared with baseline; however, this finding could be consistent with a temporary blunting of the peak transmission that was not captured between these survey time points. The other possibilities for the lack of a significant difference in parasite prevalence from baseline to 10 weeks could have been the suboptimal IRS and LLIN coverage or the limitations of a pre- and postintervention comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, a similar MDA campaign in 2020 identified four cases of SCARs, which raises concerns about using SP for MDA during the current pandemic. 44 Last, there was no change in parasite prevalence or seroprevalence at 10 weeks after the campaign compared with baseline; however, this finding could be consistent with a temporary blunting of the peak transmission that was not captured between these survey time points. The other possibilities for the lack of a significant difference in parasite prevalence from baseline to 10 weeks could have been the suboptimal IRS and LLIN coverage or the limitations of a pre- and postintervention comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The cause of this startling number of SCARs is not definitive; however, the main differences between our pilot experience in 2018 and the MDA in 2020 were related to the contextual factors of the COVID-19 pandemic. 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%