2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.05.097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of fluid flow and heat transfer in wavy micro-channels with alternating secondary branches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
44
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
7
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table provides details of the geometry and other parameters used in the experimental study of Chiam et al Numerical results obtained at various Reynolds for regular wavy MC are in reasonably good agreement with the experiments carried out in the previous studies by Chiam et al The percentage of error between the experimental and numerical results for Nusselt number and pressure drop is in the range of 21–24% and 4–14% respectively, with the same geometrical and operating conditions. The probable reason for the variation is attributed to heat flux value not being reported in Chiam et al This has been taken as 50 W/cm 2 in the current study. Still, it can very clearly be observed from Figure that the numerical results closely follow the trend of experimental results reported in Chiam et al…”
Section: Experimental Validationsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Table provides details of the geometry and other parameters used in the experimental study of Chiam et al Numerical results obtained at various Reynolds for regular wavy MC are in reasonably good agreement with the experiments carried out in the previous studies by Chiam et al The percentage of error between the experimental and numerical results for Nusselt number and pressure drop is in the range of 21–24% and 4–14% respectively, with the same geometrical and operating conditions. The probable reason for the variation is attributed to heat flux value not being reported in Chiam et al This has been taken as 50 W/cm 2 in the current study. Still, it can very clearly be observed from Figure that the numerical results closely follow the trend of experimental results reported in Chiam et al…”
Section: Experimental Validationsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…It is the ratio of heat transfer performance to the pressure drop penalty. The performance factor as defined in Chiam et al for any given geometry (B) compared with a reference geometry (A) is given by PfB=NuBfBitalicNuAfA, where,…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…on  in in TT (5) where  in represents the inlet boundary of the model. The temperature field boundary conditions for the outlet and walls in the channel layer are given by:…”
Section: Boundary Conditions Of Channel Layermentioning
confidence: 99%