2012
DOI: 10.2320/matertrans.m2011354
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Flotation Parameters for Copper Recovery from Enargite and Chalcopyrite Mixed Ore

Abstract: A flotation pre-treatment study for the separation of enargite (Cu 3 AsS 4 ) from chalcopyrite (CuFeS 2 ) ores of different origins was investigated in this work. The copper ore bearing enargite mineral contained 5.87 mass% As and 16.50 mass% Cu while the chalcopyrite bearing ore contained 0.32 mass% As and 21.63 mass% Cu. The two ore samples were mixed at 7 : 3 (enargite : chalcopyrite) by weight ratio to prepare a mixed ore sample with As content at 3.16 and 18.25 mass% Cu for the flotation study. Effect of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mine tailings contained significant amount of sulphide minerals that associated with copper and nickel, PAX collector was suggested for further experiments due to its long chain and ability to promote the recoveries of copper and nickel which are associated with chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite and pentlandite. [17]. Therefore, PAX dosage was selected as 50 g/t in further flotation studies.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Collectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the mine tailings contained significant amount of sulphide minerals that associated with copper and nickel, PAX collector was suggested for further experiments due to its long chain and ability to promote the recoveries of copper and nickel which are associated with chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite and pentlandite. [17]. Therefore, PAX dosage was selected as 50 g/t in further flotation studies.…”
Section: Effect Of Different Collectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observation could be attributed to the association of copper and nickel minerals with pyrrhotite and pyrite which are generally depressed in alkaline condition. On the other hand, under alkaline condition, iron sulfide minerals associated with copper and nickel could oxidized to form a layer of iron oxide or iron hydroxide resulting in an increase in the surface hydrophilicity of the mineral [17]. It was observed that the pH value has shown to have a significant impact on the grade and recovery of copper and nickel from mine tailing.…”
Section: Effect Of Phmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfite and thiosulfates are known as strong reductants. Sodium sulfite (Na 2 SO 3 ) was used as a pyrite depressant in separation of sphalerite and pyrite using flotation [12] and in a complex ore containing enargite and chalcopyrite [13]. Houot and Duhamet [14] reported that sodium sulfide (Na 2 S) depressed the floatability of chalcopyrite in the presence of dialkyl-thionocarbamate as a collector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that controlled pulp potential (Eh) flotation is a prospective approach to promote the separation of arsenic-copper minerals from other copper sulphides due to the strong Eh dependence of arsenic mineral flotation (Menacho et al, 1993, Yen and Tajadod, 2000, Kantar, 2002, Guo and Yen, 2005, Senior et al, 2006, Smith and Bruckard, 2007, Bruckard et al, 2010, Haga et al, 2012a, Haga et al, 2012b.…”
Section: List Of Figuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flotation separation of arsenic-bearing copper sulphides from other copper sulphides has also been studied since these minerals have similar flotation properties to copper sulphide minerals. Research on separation of arsenic-bearing copper sulphides from other copper sulphides, by flotation, indicated that Eh control has shown promising results for eliminating arsenic from other copper sulphides, due to the strong Eh dependence of arsenic mineral flotation (Menacho et al, 1993, Yen and Tajadod, 2000, Kantar, 2002, Guo and Yen, 2005, Senior et al, 2006, Smith and Bruckard, 2007, Bruckard et al, 2010, Haga et al, 2012a, Haga et al, 2012b, Ruiz et al, 2013. Menacho et al (1993) were the first to demonstrate that the separation of enargite from chalcopyriteenargite ore is possible by pulp potential control.…”
Section: Selective Flotation Using Pulp Potential (E H ) Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%