2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00466.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of febrile passengers detected by infrared thermal scanning at an international airport

Abstract: Objective: To determine the best approach for the evaluation of fever, detected by infrared thermal scanning, at an international airport. Methods: Arriving passengers with fever were divided into three groups: community evaluation by a GP, with or without cost compensation, or evaluation at the airport by a health practitioner. Uptake of offered evaluations was measured, diagnoses were recorded, and region‐specific rates of fever measured. Observations were made on practical aspects of thermal screening. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One case was detected with an infrared thermoscanner and had an actual axillary body temperature of 39°C. Although there are reports that using infrared thermoscanners might be impractical due to the low detection rate of cases with fever [21], [22], it is a convenient, cost effective, and quick way to screen large groups of people for fever, with the ultimate purpose of identifying fever-related disease of public health significance [23], [24]. In this study, an individual with fever was in fact detected using the infrared thermoscanner although not declaring it on the health declaration form; therefore, it may prove efficient both to check the health declaration forms and use the infrared thermoscanner in order to detect symptomatic individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One case was detected with an infrared thermoscanner and had an actual axillary body temperature of 39°C. Although there are reports that using infrared thermoscanners might be impractical due to the low detection rate of cases with fever [21], [22], it is a convenient, cost effective, and quick way to screen large groups of people for fever, with the ultimate purpose of identifying fever-related disease of public health significance [23], [24]. In this study, an individual with fever was in fact detected using the infrared thermoscanner although not declaring it on the health declaration form; therefore, it may prove efficient both to check the health declaration forms and use the infrared thermoscanner in order to detect symptomatic individuals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, even identifying a few cases could be important to delay the spread of disease, especially at the beginning of a pandemic [39]. Also, a study in Canada found that costs for imaging equipment were much lower than personnel costs for manual screening [40].…”
Section: Thermal Screeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informing patients on the risks of disease spread and the options for prevention can affect travel choices [28,39], increase compliance with measures [28] and promote care seeking behavior [22,40,44]. Travelers who already have symptoms may report these to crew members while traveling, and travelers who develop symptoms later on may be more likely to visit healthcare providers [26], which can prevent secondary transmission.…”
Section: Providing Information To Travelers and Authoritiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, skin temperature (T SK ) varies widely, ranging from 10 to 42°C [2]. The factors that affect T SK include exposure to certain environmental conditions, such as extreme temperatures, humidity and solar radiation [3] for long periods performing exercise [4] and the presence of pathological conditions, such as fever [5] or cancer [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%