2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-008-9272-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of failure criteria for a sharp notch

Abstract: In this study, a method of evaluating the static strength of a V-shaped notch based on the singular stress field at the notch tip is studied. The singular stress fields is defined by two parameters, K I,λ 1 and K II,λ 2 , which correspond to the intensities of symmetric stress field and the skew-symmetric field, respectively. Four kinds of fracture criteria are considered; two of them are based on the tensile strength σ B and the other two are based on the fracture toughness K I C . The usefulness of the crite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strain energy density factor S [18] was defined as the product of the strain energy density by a critical distance from the point of singularity. Failure was thought of as controlled by a critical value S c , whereas the direction of crack propagation was determined by imposing a minimum condition on S. Several criteria have been applied mainly to sharp V-notched samples but also to U-notches [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] showing a different degree of accuracy with respect to the experimental results. Seweryn and Lucaszewicz reviewed the main criteria available under mixed mode loading [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The strain energy density factor S [18] was defined as the product of the strain energy density by a critical distance from the point of singularity. Failure was thought of as controlled by a critical value S c , whereas the direction of crack propagation was determined by imposing a minimum condition on S. Several criteria have been applied mainly to sharp V-notched samples but also to U-notches [19][20][21][22][23][24][25] showing a different degree of accuracy with respect to the experimental results. Seweryn and Lucaszewicz reviewed the main criteria available under mixed mode loading [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Ozaki provided some interesting results under mixed mode loading. However, the prevalent mode during the test was mode I [23]. A modified maximum tangential stress criterion has been developed to predict the fracture toughness and fracture initiation angle in Ushaped notches under mixed mode loading or prevalent mode II loading [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mode I loading conditions and in the presence of sharp V-shaped notches, several fracture criteria have been suggested by Novozhilov (1969), Seweryn (1994), Leguillon (2001Leguillon ( , 2002, Gomez and Elices (2003a,b), Strandberg (2002), Yosibash et al (2004), Lazzarin and Zambardi (2001) and Zhang and Li (2008). However, there are very few mixed-mode I/II brittle fracture criteria for components containing sharp V-notches (see Dunn et al (1997aDunn et al ( ,1997, Seweryn and Lukaszewicz (2002), Yosibash et al (2006), Priel et al (2007) and Chen and Ozaki (2008)). Several mode I failure criteria have also been proposed and evaluated experimentally for rounded-tip V-notches and in the special case for U-notches (see Leguillon and Yosibash, 2003;Gomez and Elices, 2004and Gomez et al, 2006.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several failure criteria have been proposed for V-notches (Seweryn and Mróz 1995;Seweryn and Lucaszewicz 2002;Yosibash et al 2006;Priel et al 2007Priel et al , 2008Chen and Ozaki 2008;Ayatollahi and Aliha 2009) and for U-notches (Papadopoulos and Paniridis 1988;Gómez et al 2007Gómez et al , 2008Gómez et al , 2009, providing more or less accurate predictions for the scarce experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%