2013
DOI: 10.2147/opth.s39356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of extended blinks and interblink intervals in subjects with and without dry eye

Abstract: BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to investigate the occurrence and duration of extended blinks ≥ 70 msec and their associated interblink intervals in normal subjects and in subjects with mild to moderate dry eye.MethodsThis single-center, prospective, double-blind study included 11 subjects with dry eye and eight subjects with normal eyes. Extended blinks were defined as lid closure in at least two successive video frames (≥70 msec). Digital video imaging of each subject’s eyes was recorded while the su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In previous exploratory studies, we focused first on blink rates, or their reciprocal, IBIs, and the ability to use statistical characteristics of these time-series data to differentiate dry-eye and normal subjects 16. We then began exploring the duration of blinks, finding that abnormally long lid closures appear to occur with greater frequency in dry-eye subjects, and that the IBIs surrounding these long lid closures are modified only in dry-eye subjects 17. We turned our attention in this study to a complete categorization of blinks into their six types: three partial types (25%, 50%, and 75%), all full blinks with complete lid closure, all full extended blinks with greater than 0.1 second lid closure, and superextended blinks of greater than 0.5 second in duration, distilling into ever-narrowing categories the average total time the subjects’ eyes were closed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In previous exploratory studies, we focused first on blink rates, or their reciprocal, IBIs, and the ability to use statistical characteristics of these time-series data to differentiate dry-eye and normal subjects 16. We then began exploring the duration of blinks, finding that abnormally long lid closures appear to occur with greater frequency in dry-eye subjects, and that the IBIs surrounding these long lid closures are modified only in dry-eye subjects 17. We turned our attention in this study to a complete categorization of blinks into their six types: three partial types (25%, 50%, and 75%), all full blinks with complete lid closure, all full extended blinks with greater than 0.1 second lid closure, and superextended blinks of greater than 0.5 second in duration, distilling into ever-narrowing categories the average total time the subjects’ eyes were closed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mostly due to dry eye syndrome, only partially closed eye blink often occurs and this is called an incomplete blink [10]. Extended blinks [11] are the opposite when the eye closure (fully closed eye) lasts from 70 ms to around 1 second. Some people blink multiple times in a sequence; for example double blinks or even quadruple blinks can occur.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the assessment of signs and symptoms, various calibrated scales were used throughout the study by the investigators and the subjects. Investigators graded fluorescein staining and lissamine green staining in each eye with the Ora Calibra™ Corneal and Conjunctival Staining Scale 9 12 (Ora Calibra, Andover, MA, USA), (0–4 scale with 0.5 increments) on which 0 is no staining and 4 is severe staining. This scale divides each eye into five staining areas: the inferior, superior, and central regions relative to the cornea and the temporal and nasal regions relative to the conjunctiva.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Investigators graded lid margin redness in each eye by using the Ora Calibra™ Lid Margin Redness Scale, 12 a 4-point scale (0–3) on which 0 is none and 3 is severe. Subjects graded ocular discomfort by using the Ora Calibra™ Ocular Discomfort Scale, 9 , 10 a 5-point scale (0–4) on which 0 is no discomfort and 4 is constant discomfort. Subjects also graded the severity of their dry eye symptoms by using the Ora Calibra™ Ocular Discomfort and 4-Symptom Questionnaire, 9 , 10 , 12 a 6-point scale (0–5) on which 0 is no pain and 5 is the worst and in which five ocular symptoms are individually graded: overall discomfort, burning, dryness, grittiness, and stinging.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%