2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6471/ac8568
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of empirical heat capacity in hot-rotating A ∼ 200 nuclei

Abstract: The empirical heat capacities of some hot-rotating A ∼ 200 nuclei (184Re, 200Tl, 211Po, and 212At) have been investigated by combining the angular-momentum dependent back-shifted Fermi gas (BSFG) model of nuclear level density (NLD) with the experimental NLD data extracted from the neutron-evaporation spectra at the total angular momentum J = 12 hbar. The parameters of the BSFG are obtained by fitting its NLD to the corresponding measured data by using an advanced package of Program Modeling (CPM) provided by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the shell-correction values significantly affect the computed heat capacity (see e.g. figure 7 of [26]), noticing that the shell corrections taken from various sources might significantly differ. Considering 153 Sm as a showcase, its shell correction is determined to be 2.84 MeV using Myers-Swiatecki mass formula [42], 3.6784 MeV using the Mengoni-Nakajima one [43], but only 0.95 MeV within the finite-range droplet macroscopic and the folded Yukawa singleparticle microscopic nuclear-structure models [44], and 1.484 MeV within the systematic investigation of Egidy et al [39], in which a traditional liquid drop macroscopic formula is involved.…”
Section: The Nuclear Level Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, the shell-correction values significantly affect the computed heat capacity (see e.g. figure 7 of [26]), noticing that the shell corrections taken from various sources might significantly differ. Considering 153 Sm as a showcase, its shell correction is determined to be 2.84 MeV using Myers-Swiatecki mass formula [42], 3.6784 MeV using the Mengoni-Nakajima one [43], but only 0.95 MeV within the finite-range droplet macroscopic and the folded Yukawa singleparticle microscopic nuclear-structure models [44], and 1.484 MeV within the systematic investigation of Egidy et al [39], in which a traditional liquid drop macroscopic formula is involved.…”
Section: The Nuclear Level Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ρ(E i ) is the total NLD at a given excitation energy E i and δE i is the energy bin. The latter is chosen to be 50 keV in the present work because it is appropriate, as demonstrated in [26]. Reducing δE i changes the calculated TQs insignificantly while increasing the computation times.…”
Section: Calculation Of Thermodynamic Quantities Within the Canonical...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To overcome this drawback, one must use the theoretical NLD whenever the experimental NLD data is missing. The back-shifted Fermi gas (BSFG) NLD model, which is the most widely used phenomenological model of NLD, is often employed for this purpose [11,13]. Fitting the BSFG formula to the experimental NLD data gives the most reliable values for its free parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%