2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Elemental Mercury Removal from Coal-Fired Boiler Flue Gas over MIL101-Cr

Abstract: In this work, the MIL101-Cr sorbent with a large BET surface area was prepared and used to remove Hg 0 from the simulated coal-fired boiler flue gas. The chemical and physical properties of the prepared sorbent were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). A range of experiments was conducted in a fixed-bed reactor to investigate the effects of reaction temperature, Hg 0 inlet concentration, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) and flue gas … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is easy to see that after adding 0.04% SO 2 on the basis of pure N 2 , the Hg 0 removal efficiency at the initial stage of adsorption had a slight increase, but after reaching the highest mercury removal efficiency, it dropped quickly, and the average mercury removal efficiency decreased compared to a pure N 2 atmosphere by 9%. The reason may be as shown in reactions (3)-( 5) (O* is the surface active oxygen of the adsorbent) [11,39]. SO 2 molecules are more likely to occupy surface active sites.…”
Section: Impact Of Somentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is easy to see that after adding 0.04% SO 2 on the basis of pure N 2 , the Hg 0 removal efficiency at the initial stage of adsorption had a slight increase, but after reaching the highest mercury removal efficiency, it dropped quickly, and the average mercury removal efficiency decreased compared to a pure N 2 atmosphere by 9%. The reason may be as shown in reactions (3)-( 5) (O* is the surface active oxygen of the adsorbent) [11,39]. SO 2 molecules are more likely to occupy surface active sites.…”
Section: Impact Of Somentioning
confidence: 98%
“…34−37 Carbonaceous materials have also been widely studied owing to their ample sources and luxuriant pore structures, such as activated carbon, 38−40 petroleum coke, 41−43 and biochar. 44−47 In addition, some novel adsorbents emerged recently, i.e., metal−organic frameworks (MOFs) 48 and MXene (metal nitride or metal carbide). 49 However, their intrinsic Hg 0 affinities for pristine MOFs and MXene are very low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for noncarbon adsorbents, fly ash , and natural minerals display low intrinsic Hg 0 affinity due to their low surface areas and pore volumes. Although some zeolites have large surface areas, they still exhibit low inherent Hg 0 affinity owing to inadequate active sites. Metal oxides possess good Hg 0 oxidation ability; however, they are very sensitive to flue gas. Carbonaceous materials have also been widely studied owing to their ample sources and luxuriant pore structures, such as activated carbon, petroleum coke, and biochar. In addition, some novel adsorbents emerged recently, i.e., metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and MXene (metal nitride or metal carbide) . However, their intrinsic Hg 0 affinities for pristine MOFs and MXene are very low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A litany of investigations in this decade have been focused on designing materials with high mercury uptake capacity. Recently, the metal-coordinating organic polymers bearing sulfur binding sites have assisted to overcome these problems. Porous sorbents such as thiol-functionalized POPs, covalent organic frameworks (COFs), and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been reported for Hg­(II) removal. Although these materials demonstrated excellent activity for mercury adsorption, they are prohibitively expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%