2009
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of Effects of Nonlinear Static Analysis Procedures to Performance Evaluation on Low-Rise RC Buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Binaların kalıp planlarına ait görünümler Şekil 1a, 1b ve 1c'de verilmiştir. Düzgün ve simetrik geometriye sahip kalıp planları kullanılarak çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmıştır [3,[17][18][19]. Yapı modellerinin süneklik düzeyi yüksek, Z3 zemin sınıfı üzerinde ve birinci derece deprem bölgesinde olduğu varsayılmıştır.…”
Section: Binaların Model öZelliklerinin Tanımlanmasıunclassified
“…Binaların kalıp planlarına ait görünümler Şekil 1a, 1b ve 1c'de verilmiştir. Düzgün ve simetrik geometriye sahip kalıp planları kullanılarak çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmıştır [3,[17][18][19]. Yapı modellerinin süneklik düzeyi yüksek, Z3 zemin sınıfı üzerinde ve birinci derece deprem bölgesinde olduğu varsayılmıştır.…”
Section: Binaların Model öZelliklerinin Tanımlanmasıunclassified
“…It was mentioned that nonlinear static procedures were widely used in engineering practices in estimating seismic demands of buildings. Irtem and Hasgul (2009), in their studies, have aimed to evaluate and compare the structural reaction requests obtained from the capacity spectrum method (CSM) proposed in ATC-40 which is one of the nonlinear static analysis procedures (NSPs) and from displacement coefficients methods (DCM) proposed in FEMA 356. For this purpose, they have studied three dimensionally three multiple storied reinforcement concrete buildings of different characteristics.…”
Section: Static Pushover Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Single degree-of-freedom (SDOF) system approach is used in determination of demands in NSPs recommended in ATC 40 and FEMA 356, which is called as capacity spectrum method (CSM) and displacement coefficient method (DCM), respectively. However, these procedures have some discrepancy in determination of displacement demand for the same building model and under a specific ground motion [8] [9]. Consequently, same building performances may not be obtained due to these discrepancies in the analysis procedures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%