Investigation of Effects of Fumigants on Proteinaceous Components of Museum Objects (Muscle, Animal Glue and Silk) in Comparison with Other Non-chemical Pest Eradicating Measures

Pesticide Contamination and Archaeological Collections: Contextual Information for Preparing a Pesticide History

“…The altering effects of various pesticide chemical compounds that were historically applied directly to various collections have been reported in numerous conservation papers (e.g., Goldberg 1996; Hawks 2001; Kigawa et al 2011; Sirois et al 2008). The provides useful information on the identification, monitoring, and prevention of repository pests.…”

“…Direct physical evidence is determined through analytical techniques. A variety of pesticide testing methods have been proposed and reported on (Bengston 2005; Boyer et al 2005; Gibson et al 2014; Gribovich 2013; Hawks and Burroughs 2004; Jungries 1997; Kaye 1994; Kigawa et al 2011; Makos and Burroughs 2002; Odegaard and Sadongei 2005; Odegaard et al 2005). Two of the most commonly used are reviewed here.…”

Disinfestation of historical buildings – corrosion evaluation of four fumigants on standard metals

“…In this context, a research program was designed to study the behaviour of four alternative fumigants preserving the ozone layer on various cultural materials [2,4,5]. They are sulfuryl fluoride (SF), dimethyl disulfide (DMDS), hydrogen phosphide or phosphine (PH 3 ) and ethane dinitrile or cyanogen (EDN), used for a broad spectrum of phytosanitary and biocide applications [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Sulfuryl fluoride (SF) [3,[6][7][8][9][10] and hydrogen phosphide (PH 3 ) [3,[11][12][13] are registered gases.…”

“…However, if the efficiency of these biocides is nowadays determined, their effects on the wide variety of cultural materials, settled or placed in the historical and cultural buildings, remain to be defined or refined. Except sulfuryl fluoride fumigant, for which a large set of studies was performed on several cultural materials such as on gilding [4,5], paper and textile [17], easel painting materials [18], protineous components like animal glue and silk [19,20] or painting pigments [5,19], very little information is available for the other fumigants.…”

The Effects of Anoxic Treatments on Color and Mechanical Property in Fabrics, Natural Dyed Fabrics, Papers, Natural Dyed Papers and Paints

“…Rowe는 저산소 환경 노출 직후에는 변색이 되었으나 이를 다시 공기 중에 2주 간 재 노출시켰을 때 변색된 색상이 산화에 의해 복원되었 다고 보고하였다(Rowe, 2004). 그리고 메틸브로마이드와 같은 훈증제를 사용하였을 때 자연사 자료에서 단백질의 DNA 분자에 변화가 일어나지만, 저산소 환경에서는 근육 단백질에서 DNA 분자에 영향을 미치지 않았으며, 단백질 재질의 아교나 견섬유도 변화가 일어나지 않는 것으로 밝 혀졌다(Kigawa, et al, 2011).…”