Investigation of Dimension Stone on the Island Brač—Geophysical Approach to Rock Mass Quality Assessment

Abstract

A site located on the island of Brač is known in history for world-famous architectural stone and stone mining, dating all the way back to ancient Greek and Roman times. The most famous building constructed from the stone from Brač is the Diocletian Cesar Palace in the town Split. Prospective new locations for quarries are still required because the demand for the stone from the island is still high. This paper presents a review of undertaken geophysical investigations, as well as engineering geologic site prospection, with the purpose of determining if the rock mass quality is suitable for the mining of massive blocks needed for an architectural purpose—dimension stones. Several surface noninvasive geophysical methods were applied on the site, comprising of two seismic methods, multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW) and shallow refraction seismic (SRS) electrical methods of electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), as well as electromagnetic exploration with ground penetrating radar (GPR). Results of geophysical investigations were compared to the engineering geologic prospection results, as well to the visible rock mass structure and observed discontinuities on the neighboring existing open mine quarry. Rock mass was classified into three categories according to its suitability for dimension stone exploitation. Each category is defined by compressional and shear seismic velocities as well as electrical resistivity. It has been found that even small changes in moisture content within the large monolithic rock mass can influence measured values of electrical resistivity. In the investigated area, dimension stone quarrying is advisable if the rock mass has values of resistivity higher than 3000 Ωm, as well as compressional seismic velocities higher than 3000 m/s and shear wave velocities higher than 1500 m/s. Georadar was found to be a good tool for the visual determination of fissured systems, and was used to confirm findings from other geophysical methods.

Detection of Cover Collapse Doline and Other Epikarst Features by Multiple Geophysical Techniques, Case Study of Tarimba Cave, Brazil

“…The shallow seismic refraction method is ideal for estimating, with reasonable accuracy, the depth of different geological interfaces for different purposes such as geotechnical [49] and engineering geological investigations [50], site characterization of landslide areas [51] hydrogeological analysis [52] (Prekopová et al, 2016) archaeological exploration [53,54] and site characterizations of karst areas for large penetration and at high spatial resolution [3,20,55]. Further details about the application of the method can be found in [56].…”

Time-Lapse GPR Measurements to Monitor Resin Injection in Fractures of Marble Blocks

“…In recent years, the quarrying industry has experienced increasing demands for nondestructive sensing techniques to optimize stone production, from on-site extraction operation, to quality control of the extracted blocks [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. Fractures present in building stones (either in situ large fractures or small defects of the produced stones) have always concerned the quarry people as well as engineers engaged in the restoration and conservation of stone monuments.…”

Editorial of Special Issue "Modern Surveying and Geophysical Methods for Soil and Rock"

“…Jug et al [1] combined several surface non-destructive geophysical methods, including multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW), shallow refraction seismic (SRS), electrical resistivity tomography (ERT), and ground-penetrating radar (GPR), to investigate dimension stone on the Island Brač in Croatia, where the methods are key tools to assess the quality of rock mass and classify its suitability for exploitation purposes. Finally, rock mass was classified into three categories according to its suitability for dimension stone exploitation, where each category is defined by compressional and shear seismic velocities as well as electrical resistivity.…”