2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.04.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of crack propagation resistance of 304L, 316L and 316L(N) austenitic steels in liquid sodium

Abstract: The fracture behavior of 3 austenitic steels has been tested in liquid sodium on notched tensile specimens after pre-wetting in oxygenated sodium (200 wppm). Austenitic steels are shown to have decreasing crack propagation resistance in liquid oxygenated sodium for some experimental conditions. Crack initiation occurs after significant plastic deformation. Evidences of brittle fracture are observed on the fracture surface. The effect of impurities on LME susceptibility is estimated to be unlikely.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on these stress-strain curves, the main difference between samples before and after hydrogen embrittlement (HE) test was the type of failure. Sample which did not undergo hydrogen embrittlement test experienced ductile failure, while the HE samples experienced brittle fracture, as deduced by the sudden, drastic decrease in stress after a strain similar with previous studies [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The tensile strain at maximum load of stainless steel before hydrogen embrittlement test (most ductile) is 50.29% while the tensile strain of stainless steel after one day immersion test (most brittle) is 19.78%.…”
Section: Hardness Testsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Based on these stress-strain curves, the main difference between samples before and after hydrogen embrittlement (HE) test was the type of failure. Sample which did not undergo hydrogen embrittlement test experienced ductile failure, while the HE samples experienced brittle fracture, as deduced by the sudden, drastic decrease in stress after a strain similar with previous studies [21][22][23][24][25][26]. The tensile strain at maximum load of stainless steel before hydrogen embrittlement test (most ductile) is 50.29% while the tensile strain of stainless steel after one day immersion test (most brittle) is 19.78%.…”
Section: Hardness Testsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…With the exception of 14Cr ODS steels, which showed a pronounced LME effect, the 9Cr and 18Cr ODS steels did not exhibit evident signs of LME after short-term exposures to liquid Na [439]. By contrast, AuSS were observed to be much less sensitive to LME in contact with liquid Na, even though a small amount of intergranular and/or cleavage fracture features were occasionally observed [439][440][441][442][443]. Interestingly, the plastic straining-induced phase transformation of austenite (γ, fcc) to ferrite (α, bcc) increased the susceptibility of AuSS to LME caused by liquid Na, as reported by Barkia et al [441,443].…”
Section: New Understandings Of Lme In the Past Two Decadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, AuSS were observed to be much less sensitive to LME in contact with liquid Na, even though a small amount of intergranular and/or cleavage fracture features were occasionally observed [439][440][441][442][443]. Interestingly, the plastic straining-induced phase transformation of austenite (γ, fcc) to ferrite (α, bcc) increased the susceptibility of AuSS to LME caused by liquid Na, as reported by Barkia et al [441,443]. This suggests that differences in the LME susceptibilities of ferritic, F/ M steels and AuSS may be primarily associated with their different crystal lattices (i.e., fcc vs. bcc steels).…”
Section: New Understandings Of Lme In the Past Two Decadesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection system can detect neutron signals emitted by delayed neutron precursors. The oxide-sodium reaction (OSR) happens [9]. • Wide rupture: The oxygen atoms feeding the oxidesodium reaction mainly come from the sodium coolant, which continuously flows along the fuel oxide at the rupture location.…”
Section: A Evolution Of the Fuel Pin Failurementioning
confidence: 99%