2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of combined stress state failure criterion for glass fiber/epoxy interface by the cruciform specimen method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, without any inconsistencies with conventional studies [9, 14-17, 19, 21], it is found that the time-dependent interfacial failure evolution and load recovery profile of failure fiber in the single-fiber composite can be simulated by applying the quasi-parabolic failure criterion. This result simultaneously leads that the parabolic criterion can be more appropriate than the quadratic criterion for interface failure; although Ogihara et al [30] did not discuss which criterion is better for interface failure criterion. Thus, it can be suggested that an interfacial failure surface plot, like Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, without any inconsistencies with conventional studies [9, 14-17, 19, 21], it is found that the time-dependent interfacial failure evolution and load recovery profile of failure fiber in the single-fiber composite can be simulated by applying the quasi-parabolic failure criterion. This result simultaneously leads that the parabolic criterion can be more appropriate than the quadratic criterion for interface failure; although Ogihara et al [30] did not discuss which criterion is better for interface failure criterion. Thus, it can be suggested that an interfacial failure surface plot, like Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As shown in Figs. 7 (G IIc =1.0 N/m) and 9, the analytical [30] is chosen, employing an empirical degradation interface element can potentially lead a reasonable analytical result as well as in this study. But the empirical degradation element would not agree with the results of the existing article [17] in which it is reported the interfacial time-dependency is negligible or small.…”
Section: Numerical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These articles present the interfacial failure envelope under combined stresses, obtained using a cruciform specimen test in which the off-load axis is varied to create various normal/shear stress ratios. An earlier study [63] solved the important problem of the unclear microscopic location of interfacial failure initiation using a novel method. However, the failure envelope remains partially indeterminable considering the following points.…”
Section: Analysis Of Single Fiber Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using the contact softening model to represent the fibre/matrix interface, both interfacial strength and fracture energy must be known. Unfortunately, these properties are difficult to obtain from simple laboratory experiments [35]. In this study, the interfacial strength is assumed to be equal to the cohesion of the matrix, c, and according to the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion the relationship between the cohesion and matrix strength is given by: sin cos (25) where is the friction angle and can be related to the fracture surface angle by:…”
Section: Parametric Study Of Bond Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fracture angle plane in the case of biaxial loading is slightly different from that for uniaxial compression in Eq. (26) and given by: (35) in which arctan . Note that in case of uniaxial loading, 23 =0, Eq.…”
Section: Dem Prediction Of the Failure Envelopementioning
confidence: 99%