2020
DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12362
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of colorectal cancer in accordance with consensus molecular subtype classification

Abstract: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, 1 indicating a global need for better prognosis and treatment strategies. The TNM classification is commonly used to determine the progression of CRC; however, more in-depth characterization is necessary to better assess treatment strategies and prognosis. Several classifications for CRC have been reported in accordance with gene signatures, the most robust of which is the consensus molecular subtype (CMS) system. 2 CMS clas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CMS classification system for CRC has proven effective in understanding disease prognosis and tumor biology, with distinct gene sets and oncogenic pathways significantly associated with each of the four different subtypes (CMSs) [19,20,22,60]. However, having been developed using bulk transcriptomic data, there is now increasing recognition that there are distinct contributions to bulk CMS from both tumor and non-tumor cells and that CMS may not be adequate to capture intra-tumor heterogeneity [24,[61][62][63]. Specifically, the classification of CMS4 tumors has been identified as primarily influenced by genes expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and other stromal cell subtypes [64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CMS classification system for CRC has proven effective in understanding disease prognosis and tumor biology, with distinct gene sets and oncogenic pathways significantly associated with each of the four different subtypes (CMSs) [19,20,22,60]. However, having been developed using bulk transcriptomic data, there is now increasing recognition that there are distinct contributions to bulk CMS from both tumor and non-tumor cells and that CMS may not be adequate to capture intra-tumor heterogeneity [24,[61][62][63]. Specifically, the classification of CMS4 tumors has been identified as primarily influenced by genes expressed in cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and other stromal cell subtypes [64][65][66][67].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They incorporated molecular subtyping with phenotypic signatures displayed by each subtypes to aid in disease stratification in routine pathology. Nevertheless, CMS was still limited due to the intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) detected and unreliability in the tissue biopsy samples (43% unknown) [ 44 , 45 ]. In short, the lack of a standardized MSI-based classification system, the use of tissue biopsy samples, the presence of ITH and the variations of MSI status across different subtypes complicates CRC diagnosis and treatment.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Of Current Tissue Biopsy-based Msi Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic and predictive factors of CMS classes were demonstrated in retrospective analysis of multiple phase III clinical trials [8,9,[14][15][16][17][18][19]. The prognostic role of CMS classification was well established in most of the studies, with prognosis of each CMS class varying from early-stage to advanced-stage tumors [8][9][10]14,15,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%