2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.04.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of cobalt(II) retention from aqueous solutions by a polyamide nanofiltration membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the ions rejection remained constant when increasing the applied pressure. This result agrees with the literature findings that indicate that the two phenomena (the solvent flux and concentration polarization) have opposite effects on the ions rejection [ 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As a result, the ions rejection remained constant when increasing the applied pressure. This result agrees with the literature findings that indicate that the two phenomena (the solvent flux and concentration polarization) have opposite effects on the ions rejection [ 51 , 52 ].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Since the PAH/PSS films assembled in this paper are terminated by a cationic PAH film, the surface of the modified film is positive, thus leading to repulsive interactions between the modified membrane and the metal cations. Such mechanism was also observed by Gherasim et al who studied the retention of cobalt ions by an organic tubular membrane [11]. In addition, we have already shown in previous studies that: (i) the retention of copper ions by a polymer-based modified membrane increases when the charge of the polycation increases and/or the charge of the polyanion decreases, thus indicating a strong influence of the polymer film's charge [17]; and (ii) the retention rate of a polymer-modified membrane is far higher when the multilayer film is terminated by a polycation layer than when it is terminated by a polyanion layer [18].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Concerning nanofiltration, this technique has attractive advantages such as high separation efficiency, easy operation, and easy to scale up [9,10]. However, nanofiltration suffers from its high energy consumption and cost due to the need to perform the filtration of metal ions at high operating pressure (10-30 bars) [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the World Health Organization guidelines, the permissible concentration of cadmium in drinking water is < 0.005 mg L −1 [6]. Different methods were used for removal of heavy metals from wastewaters include ion-exchange, chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, evaporation, membrane filtration, adsorption, and biosorption [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. However, there are some disadvantages in these methods such as incomplete metal removal, complex procedure, high cost and low efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%