2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of clusters and injuries in pedestrian crashes using GIS in Changsha, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the distribution of traffic accidents can be visualized through GIS visualization technology [7][8][9]. On the other hand, by using a variety of spatial analysis tools in GIS, scholars can explore the spatial distribution characteristics of traffic accidents and the spatial relationship between different traffic accidents from a variety of perspectives [10][11][12]. e most common spatial statistical methods in GIS are density analysis, which accomplishes spatial visualization of accidents through kernel density and point density methods [13][14][15][16], cluster analysis, which can identify the spatial distribution of traffic accidents as aggregation, diffusion, or random distributions by nearest neighbor distance, and Ripley's K function method [17][18][19], which can identify traffic accident hotspot areas by hotspot analysis [20][21][22] and spatial autocorrelation analysis [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, the distribution of traffic accidents can be visualized through GIS visualization technology [7][8][9]. On the other hand, by using a variety of spatial analysis tools in GIS, scholars can explore the spatial distribution characteristics of traffic accidents and the spatial relationship between different traffic accidents from a variety of perspectives [10][11][12]. e most common spatial statistical methods in GIS are density analysis, which accomplishes spatial visualization of accidents through kernel density and point density methods [13][14][15][16], cluster analysis, which can identify the spatial distribution of traffic accidents as aggregation, diffusion, or random distributions by nearest neighbor distance, and Ripley's K function method [17][18][19], which can identify traffic accident hotspot areas by hotspot analysis [20][21][22] and spatial autocorrelation analysis [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tables 8 and 11 show how pedestrian responsibility in traffic accidents, in interaction with demographic and infrastructure variables, show states with a higher risk of serious or fatal injury, especially when there are no pavements (36.17%), poor or no lighting (24.62%), high-speed roads that are not pedestrian-friendly (49.36%) and age groups over 60 years old (31.83%). Consistent with these data, a study published in 2020 using data from China [23], found that the higher severity of pedestrian casualties in traffic accidents is closely related to age (elderly), lighting conditions (occasional darkness), roads (high speed) and infrastructure (such as pavements), as well as pedestrian behaviour.…”
Section: Results Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…ese studies use the frequency and severity of traffic conflicts to indirectly reflect the level of traffic safety, which mainly focuses on the effectiveness of traffic conflicts [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19], traffic conflict evaluation indicators [20,21], and data methods [22,23]. To facilitate the extension and application of the definition of traffic conflict in practice, scholars have proposed a variety of traffic conflict indicators to quantify the proximity and interaction between two or more road users in time or space.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%