DOI: 10.31274/rtd-180816-1438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of cluster analysis as a grouping procedure for MMPI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the popularity of another configurai classification strategy, MMPI code types (e.g., Marks & Seeman, 1963;Giiberstadt & Duker, 1965), another limitation of this study involves the lack of comparison between code type groups versus multivariate classifications for subjects in RDC psychopathological groups. Such results would have provided valuable information to complement previous studies (e.g., Toenjes, 1977). However, this was precluded due to the small number of profiles which had identifiable code types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Given the popularity of another configurai classification strategy, MMPI code types (e.g., Marks & Seeman, 1963;Giiberstadt & Duker, 1965), another limitation of this study involves the lack of comparison between code type groups versus multivariate classifications for subjects in RDC psychopathological groups. Such results would have provided valuable information to complement previous studies (e.g., Toenjes, 1977). However, this was precluded due to the small number of profiles which had identifiable code types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%